Categories
Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
The Taking of Pelham 123
Film, TV & DVD » The Taking of Pelham 123 (Posts 1 to 30 of 42)
-
- CommentTimeMar 9th 2009
Trailer's out.
Love it.
I am a sucker for Tony Scott, Denzel Washington and when Travolta goes evil, it's a rather enjoyable ride. Apart from that, HARRY GREGSON WILLIAMS seems to do good ONLY with Tony Scott during the last 5 years so why not
http://www.apple.com/trailers/sony_pict … pelham123/Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders. -
- CommentAuthorTimmer
- CommentTimeMar 9th 2009
Have you seen the original D ?On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt -
- CommentTimeMar 9th 2009
I love the original one, but I can´t wait to watch Scott´s version!Anything with an orchestra or with a choir....at some point will reach you -
- CommentTimeMar 9th 2009
Some films should be left well enough alone.
-Erik-host and executive producer of THE CINEMATIC SOUND RADIO PODCAST | www.cinematicsound.net | www.facebook.com/cinematicsound | I HAVE TINNITUS! -
- CommentAuthorAnthony
- CommentTimeMar 9th 2009
Ooh, and it's out a day before my birthday!
That does look pretty good, and I too love Travolta going evil (I recently saw Swordfish which I enjoyed as well). -
- CommentTimeMar 9th 2009
If ever there was a film which shouldn't have been made... -
- CommentAuthorTimmer
- CommentTimeMar 9th 2009 edited
Southall wrote
If ever there was a film which shouldn't have been made...
Where shall we start? Get Carter!? It's my personal why? WHY? WHY?On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt -
- CommentTimeMar 9th 2009
Timmer wrote
Southall wrote
If ever there was a film which shouldn't have been made...
Where shall we start? Get Carter!? It's my personal why? WHY? WHY?
I haven't seen that - and don't suppose I ever will.
Can somebody please explain to me - what's the point of remaking a GOOD film? What on earth are you ever going to achieve by doing so? -
- CommentAuthorTimmer
- CommentTimeMar 9th 2009
Erik Woods wrote
Some films should be left well enough alone.
-Erik-
Totally!
The original is a classic, this remake at best will be "watchable".On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt -
- CommentAuthorTimmer
- CommentTimeMar 9th 2009
Southall wrote
Timmer wrote
Southall wrote
If ever there was a film which shouldn't have been made...
Where shall we start? Get Carter!? It's my personal why? WHY? WHY?
I haven't seen that - and don't suppose I ever will.
Can somebody please explain to me - what's the point of remaking a GOOD film? What on earth are you ever going to achieve by doing so?
Do you mean you've never seen Stallone's remake James?On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt -
- CommentTimeMar 9th 2009
Timmer wrote
Do you mean you've never seen Stallone's remake James?
That's right. Needless to say, I've seen the classic original! -
- CommentAuthorTimmer
- CommentTimeMar 9th 2009
Southall wrote
Timmer wrote
Do you mean you've never seen Stallone's remake James?
That's right. Needless to say, I've seen the classic original!
Unfortunately I have seen the Stallone remake.
I know I don't need to say this but I'll still give my opinion on watching it with one word....
DON'T!On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt -
- CommentTimeMar 10th 2009 edited
Unfortunately Hollywood feels, like it or not, that if they can make money on it they'll remake it. Nothing is sacred.listen to more classical music! -
- CommentTimeMar 10th 2009
It's not like it got a crappy little remake, is it? Tony Scott is one very good filmmaker imo, with a distinct personal style.Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders. -
- CommentTimeMar 10th 2009
Christodoulides wrote
It's not like it got a crappy little remake, is it? Tony Scott is one very good filmmaker imo, with a distinct personal style.
If you like Tony Scott then I guess it's not a problem. Sadly, I don't. When was his last good film? Spy Game? -
- CommentTimeMar 10th 2009
Well, all of them? I thought all, Man on Fire, Domino, Deja vu had a very distinct character in them, something special in their own terms.Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders. -
- CommentAuthorTimmer
- CommentTimeMar 10th 2009 edited
Christodoulides wrote
It's not like it got a crappy little remake, is it? Tony Scott is one very good filmmaker imo, with a distinct personal style.
The Coen brothers are great film makers and even they have they're odd blip or two, most glaringly with the totally unecessary remake of Ealing classic THE LADY KILLERS.
p.s. Tony Scott is nowhere near the league of the Coen's.On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt -
- CommentTimeMar 10th 2009
Geesh! What a tepid trailer!
If only the folks who are raving about this checked out the 1974 original then...
bum-bum-bum da da-da da da-da da bum-bum-bum -
- CommentTimeMar 10th 2009
BhelPuri wrote
Geesh! What a tepid trailer!
If only the folks who are raving about this checked out the 1974 original then...
bum-bum-bum da da-da da da-da da bum-bum-bum
One thing is for sure... we aren't going to get a score nearly as good as Shire's classic!
-Erik-host and executive producer of THE CINEMATIC SOUND RADIO PODCAST | www.cinematicsound.net | www.facebook.com/cinematicsound | I HAVE TINNITUS! -
- CommentTimeMar 10th 2009
Christodoulides wrote
Well, all of them? I thought all, Man on Fire, Domino, Deja vu had a very distinct character in them, something special in their own terms.
Agreed. Man on Fire and Domino (and their precursor, SpyGame) were very influential in term of influencing the current visual style of cinema. -
- CommentTimeMar 10th 2009 edited
Timmer wrote
p.s. Tony Scott is nowhere near the league of the Coen's.
Since we're really comparing a visual filmmaker with two brothers who are only good (not all the time) when they write and direct their own stuff. -
- CommentTimeMar 10th 2009
Bad press is still press and people will go and see it. As bad as "The Day the Earth Stood Still" was people still went and saw it.listen to more classical music! -
- CommentAuthorTimmer
- CommentTimeMar 10th 2009
Erik Woods wrote
BhelPuri wrote
Geesh! What a tepid trailer!
If only the folks who are raving about this checked out the 1974 original then...
bum-bum-bum da da-da da da-da da bum-bum-bum
One thing is for sure... we aren't going to get a score nearly as good as Shire's classic!
-Erik-
Extremely unlikely.On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt -
- CommentTimeMar 10th 2009
I think it looks promising, plus Travolta as a bad guy is always coolwaaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh -
- CommentTimeMar 10th 2009
Yeap, Tony Scott isn't the greatest filmmaker out there for sure, but you have to remember people we're in 2009. New things will inevitably happen and i think Tony Scott is at least one of the slick and original new things to happen.Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders. -
- CommentTimeMar 10th 2009
Tony Scott? New? Hasn't he been making films since the late 80s? -
- CommentTimeMar 11th 2009
I wonder if this new guy Tony Scott will link up with one of the up-and-coming composers out there, someone like John Williams or Ennio Morricone perhaps. -
- CommentTimeMar 11th 2009
It'd be nice to see them get their first breaks, they more than deserve it. -
- CommentTimeMar 11th 2009
Time will tell my friendslisten to more classical music! -
- CommentAuthorTimmer
- CommentTimeMar 11th 2009
Southall wrote
I wonder if this new guy Tony Scott will link up with one of the up-and-coming composers out there, someone like John Williams or Ennio Morricone perhaps.
On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt