Categories
Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
-
- CommentAuthorMiya
- CommentTimeJun 24th 2009
Do you know what tuna is?Labels are for cans, not people. - Anthony Rapp -
- CommentAuthorLSH
- CommentTimeJun 24th 2009
Jean is shorter than Brutus but taller than Imhotep. Imhotep is taller than Jean, but shorter than Lord Scotland. Lord Scotland is twice the height of Jean and Brutus combined but only one-tenth of the height of Millsy. Millsy is at a constant height of x − y. If Jean stands exactly one nautical mile away from Lord Scotland, how tall is Imhotep? -
- CommentAuthorMartijn
- CommentTimeJun 24th 2009 edited
Stavroula wrote
-question-
Martijn wrote
Don't overtax him!
One question at a time, or he might overheat and break!
And then where would we be?
Miya wrote
-question-
LSH wrote
-question-
Oh you've done it now.
YOU'VE DONE IT NOW!
You're all banned!
ALL of you!
Except Stavi.
Because..er...because she's ...ehm...
Greek.
Yeah.
That's it!'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn -
- CommentAuthorMartijn
- CommentTimeJun 24th 2009
Incidentally: are you sure you got all the names right?
the beginning seems incompatible:
LSH wrote
Jean is <...> taller than Imhotep. Imhotep is taller than Jean. ...'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn -
- CommentAuthorLSH
- CommentTimeJun 24th 2009
Imhotep is invisible. -
- CommentAuthorMartijn
- CommentTimeJun 24th 2009 edited
Invisibility only has to to do with the breaking of light, not actual dimensions.
If Imhotep is both taller and shorter than a given constant, we can only assume that Imhotep is in a state of constant flux.
Chaos in fact.
In fact, I think a valid case can be made that Imhotep's true name may be Azathoth.
Interestingly Imhotep and Thoth (an integral part of Azathoth) both are Egyptian architect gods: Gods of creation, while Azathoth is the ultimate personification of madness and chaos.
Therefore being incorporeal, short and tall, creator and destroyer all in one, I think your riddle may well be the propehcy to lead us to the end of the world...or indeed of existence as we know it.
With 2012 rapidly approaching, is this coincidence?
I think not...'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn -
- CommentAuthorLSH
- CommentTimeJun 24th 2009
Well done! You win a box of electricity, courtesy of Quaker Oats.
-
- CommentAuthorMartijn
- CommentTimeJun 24th 2009
I'm positively shocked.'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn -
- CommentAuthorPawelStroinski
- CommentTimeJun 24th 2009
http://www.filmmusic.pl - Polish Film Music Review Website -
- CommentAuthorWilliam
- CommentTimeJun 24th 2009
Too. Many. Questions! 
-
- CommentAuthoromaha
- CommentTimeJun 24th 2009
everyone get down!
-
- CommentAuthorWilliam
- CommentTimeJun 24th 2009
omaha wrote
everyone get down!
Too late.
I shot you.
-
- CommentAuthorSouthall
- CommentTimeJun 25th 2009
How could I ever refuse? (I feel like I win when I lose!) -
- CommentAuthorWilliam
- CommentTimeJun 25th 2009
Southall wrote
How could I ever refuse? (I feel like I win when I lose!)
That rhymed.
-
- CommentAuthorfranz_conrad
- CommentTimeJun 25th 2009
I have a question for the seer of seers and the prognosticator of prognosticators.
Do you feel the recent upward revisions in Australia's economic growth forecasts are premature, or were recent declarations that the 'end of the world' was upon us overly-pessimistic?A butterfly thinks therefore I am -
- CommentAuthorWilliam
- CommentTimeJun 25th 2009
franz_conrad wrote
I have a question for the seer of seers and the prognosticator of prognosticators.
Epic win.
So wait; you had a question? Sorry? I don't think I heard you. 
-
- CommentAuthorThomas Glorieux
- CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
I have a moral dilemma
Bregt says the site will vaporize once he'll fall out of the top 10 posters
I'm eleventh, and I can't stop posting
what must I do William?
Fight my pride and remain eleventh?
or go for it and see what happens?
What must I do William?waaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh -
- CommentAuthorAnthony
- CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
It's the only way to save us all! -
- CommentAuthorPawelStroinski
- CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
http://www.filmmusic.pl - Polish Film Music Review Website -
- CommentAuthorSteven
- CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
Take me out of the top 10. There, problem solved.
No really, I couldn't care less if my post count was reset! I've already dared Martijn to do it.
-
- CommentAuthorThomas Glorieux
- CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
Anthony wrote
It's the only way to save us all!
I know, please do think less of me fatherwaaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh -
- CommentAuthorSteven
- CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
Anthony wrote
It's the only way to save us all!
Bam. (Quite literally.) -
- CommentAuthorWilliam
- CommentTimeJul 1st 2009
Thomas Glorieux wrote
I have a moral dilemma
Bregt says the site will vaporize once he'll fall out of the top 10 posters
I'm eleventh, and I can't stop posting
what must I do William?
Fight my pride and remain eleventh?
or go for it and see what happens?
What must I do William?
Hmmm... This one's a toughie. I say you should go for it and see what happens. And immediately duck for cover, afterwards.
-
- CommentAuthorWilliam
- CommentTimeJul 1st 2009
Thomas Glorieux wrote
Anthony wrote
It's the only way to save us all!
I know, please do think less of me father
Anthony's your father?
-
- CommentAuthorPawelStroinski
- CommentTimeJul 1st 2009
Aren't you supposed to ANSWER question, not ASK them?http://www.filmmusic.pl - Polish Film Music Review Website -
- CommentAuthorMartijn
- CommentTimeJul 1st 2009
William wrote
Anthony's your father?
No.
No!
That's not true.
That's impossible!'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn -
- CommentAuthorWilliam
- CommentTimeJul 1st 2009
PawelStroinski wrote
Aren't you supposed to ANSWER question, not ASK them?
I wondered if anyone would catch that.
-
- CommentAuthorSteven
- CommentTimeJul 1st 2009
I need your wisdom and guidance William. I have two propositions: The first proposition states that the second proposition is false. The second proposition also states that the first proposition is false. Which one is false? They can't be both false and both true, surely? -
- CommentAuthorTimmer
- CommentTimeJul 1st 2009
Steven asks one of the burning questions of our times but if anyone can answer it, William can.On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt -
- CommentAuthorBregt
- CommentTimeJul 1st 2009 edited
I'm pulling a William.
Since the first proposition was first, and the second followed upon the first, it is clear that the first proposition is true, since that proposition couldn't be ruled out by an other proposition. The second proposition clearly followed, with the first proposition knowing it would, so it already stated that the second proposition would be false, even though in itself it doesn't say so.Kazoo
