• Categories

Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

 
  1. Steven wrote
    I still think Bay might as well have made a porno starring Megan Fox with random action scenes of Transformers in-between sex scenes (or during). That's basically the kind of film Michael Bay wants to make.


    Transformers 3: Mikaela makes a SLO MO Run for it tongue
    waaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh
    • CommentAuthorAnthony
    • CommentTimeJun 25th 2009
    ...and the kind of film I want.
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeJun 25th 2009
    Don't we all? nurse
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
    •  
      CommentAuthorMartijn
    • CommentTimeJun 26th 2009
    Steven wrote
    I still think Bay might as well have made a porno starring Megan Fox with random action scenes of Transformers in-between sex scenes (or during). That's basically the kind of film Michael Bay wants to make.


    I guess Transformers wasn't arty enough...
    'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeJun 26th 2009
    I am sure she reads maintitles'
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
  2. Astonishing shocked

    Transformers: A $201.2-Million Smash In 5-Day Opening

    Paramount's Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen came within inches -- well, $2.6 million -- of overtaking last year’s The Dark Knight as the film with the best 5-day opening of all time. According to studio estimates, it grossed $201.2 million versus $203.8 for Warner Bros.’ Knight. The figure included estimated results for Sunday, therefore final actual ticket sales, to be released on Monday, could push the total past Knight’s record mark. Then again, the Los Angeles Times reported that some competing studios estimated that the total will come in closer to $197-199 million. The newspaper said that Paramount spent about $200 million to produce the film and $150-175 million on worldwide marketing and distribution. IMAX, which has been expanding its giant-screen venues (some critics contend that the size of the newer screens is being misrepresented), contributed $14.4 million to the gross. Although IMAX theaters accounted for less than 4 percent of those screening the movie, they nevertheless produced 7.2 percent of the estimated gross.

    if you read this, they spend almost as much money on marketing it than making it face-palm-mt
    waaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh
    •  
      CommentAuthorErik Woods
    • CommentTimeJun 29th 2009
    Thomas Glorieux wrote
    Astonishing shocked

    Transformers: A $201.2-Million Smash In 5-Day Opening

    if you read this, they spend almost as much money on marketing it than making it face-palm-mt


    Which is usually the case with most movies. Just because these special effects heavy blockbusters make big bucks at the box office doesn't mean they turn a profit.

    -Erik-
    host and producer of CINEMATIC SOUND RADIO | www.cinematicsound.net | www.facebook.com/cinematicsound | I HAVE TINNITUS!
  3. Erik Woods wrote
    Thomas Glorieux wrote
    Astonishing shocked

    Transformers: A $201.2-Million Smash In 5-Day Opening

    if you read this, they spend almost as much money on marketing it than making it face-palm-mt


    Which is usually the case with most movies. Just because these special effects heavy blockbusters make big bucks at the box office doesn't mean they turn a profit.

    -Erik-


    indeed, they just won back the money they spend on making it, now they have to earn back their marketing money

    But not to worry, DVD and Blu-Ray will do that in the end
    waaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh
    •  
      CommentAuthorMarselus
    • CommentTimeJun 29th 2009
    Thomas Glorieux wrote
    Erik Woods wrote
    Thomas Glorieux wrote
    Astonishing shocked

    Transformers: A $201.2-Million Smash In 5-Day Opening

    if you read this, they spend almost as much money on marketing it than making it face-palm-mt


    Which is usually the case with most movies. Just because these special effects heavy blockbusters make big bucks at the box office doesn't mean they turn a profit.

    -Erik-


    indeed, they just won back the money they spend on making it, now they have to earn back their marketing money

    But not to worry, DVD and Blu-Ray will do that in the end

    And overseas box office, which most of the times save the day to the producers / distributors.
    Anything with an orchestra or with a choir....at some point will reach you
  4. Marselus wrote
    Thomas Glorieux wrote
    Erik Woods wrote
    Thomas Glorieux wrote
    Astonishing shocked

    Transformers: A $201.2-Million Smash In 5-Day Opening

    if you read this, they spend almost as much money on marketing it than making it face-palm-mt


    Which is usually the case with most movies. Just because these special effects heavy blockbusters make big bucks at the box office doesn't mean they turn a profit.

    -Erik-


    indeed, they just won back the money they spend on making it, now they have to earn back their marketing money

    But not to worry, DVD and Blu-Ray will do that in the end

    And overseas box office, which most of the times save the day to the producers / distributors.


    yay, we helped Transformers win some money back 2 wink
    I would like to help them again, but I don't feel like it tongue
    waaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh
  5. I helped them too yesterday. The movie was utterly fun but also utterly stupid. Two dogs humping for 10 minutes? But the fight scenes lick
    http://www.filmmusic.pl - Polish Film Music Review Website
  6. PawelStroinski wrote
    I helped them too yesterday. The movie was utterly fun but also utterly stupid. Two dogs humping for 10 minutes? But the fight scenes lick


    ah yes the humping dogs, and that's just the mild rude humour wink
    but the effects are amazing, plus this is one of those movies you absolutely need to see in the cinema. Not only for the big screen, but especially for the ambiance, the laughter of the people. I don't think I'll enjoy the humour of the second as much when I'm watching it home alone
    waaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh
  7. John Turturro is absolutely hilarious, but I would cut on the college party scenes (except the Einstein thing). It isn't as breathtaking as the first part, too, if only because it basically stays in tune with the first movie, where some camera setups were just WOW.

    Michael Bay should learn that there is something like a STAND. He even moves his camera around when you have an emotional scene. NOT a good idea.
    http://www.filmmusic.pl - Polish Film Music Review Website
  8. PawelStroinski wrote
    John Turturro is absolutely hilarious, but I would cut on the college party scenes (except the Einstein thing). It isn't as breathtaking as the first part, too, if only because it basically stays in tune with the first movie, where some camera setups were just WOW.

    Michael Bay should learn that there is something like a STAND. He even moves his camera around when you have an emotional scene. NOT a good idea.


    that's bay
    the first part is indeed too slow and I think it will bore rather quickly when you see it a couple of times

    But that first movie will never bore punk
    waaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh
  9. It wasn't slow, only badly written.
    http://www.filmmusic.pl - Polish Film Music Review Website
    • CommentAuthorAnthony
    • CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
    The only good things about the movie were Megan Fox and Isabel Lucas. lick
  10. Anthony wrote
    The only good things about the movie were Megan Fox and Isabel Lucas. lick


    ah yes Isabel Lucas, cute cute and cute

    a dangerous combination cheesy
    waaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh
    • CommentAuthorAnthony
    • CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
    Thomas Glorieux wrote
    Anthony wrote
    The only good things about the movie were Megan Fox and Isabel Lucas. lick


    ah yes Isabel Lucas, cute cute and cute

    a dangerous combination cheesy


    I would do disgusting, beautiful things to her...
  11. Anthony wrote
    Thomas Glorieux wrote
    Anthony wrote
    The only good things about the movie were Megan Fox and Isabel Lucas. lick


    ah yes Isabel Lucas, cute cute and cute

    a dangerous combination cheesy


    I would do disgusting, beautiful things to her...


    perhaps disgusting is beautiful for her wink
    waaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
    Anthony wrote
    Thomas Glorieux wrote
    Anthony wrote
    The only good things about the movie were Megan Fox and Isabel Lucas. lick


    ah yes Isabel Lucas, cute cute and cute

    a dangerous combination cheesy


    I would do disgusting, beautiful things to her...


    I would destroy her.

    Therapy's going great by the way.
  12. Steven wrote
    Therapy's going great by the way.


    I'm so glad for you wave
    waaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
    Thanks. It's the support that gets me through it.
  13. Steven wrote
    Thanks. It's the support that gets me through it.


    biggrin
    waaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh
    •  
      CommentAuthoromaha
    • CommentTimeJul 1st 2009
    Going to see it now.
    I'm really tired though. I've gotten about three each night for the past couple of nights. I hope I can make it through. sleep



    Poor Megan Fox. If she was ever locked in a room with ANY guy. shocked


    wink
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeJul 1st 2009
    The fact that such a movie gathers all this debate, is a sign of our cinematic times i guess?
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
    •  
      CommentAuthoromaha
    • CommentTimeJul 1st 2009 edited
    God awful. It was absolute torture. Could have cut out about 40 minutes. It had a good 30 seconds I'd say.

    Anyway, worst movie experience of my life. Surrounded by people talking to the movie and clapping their hands. A baby shit its pants right next to me. The father was holding it and would not change its diaper. It got unbearable and I had to move. Then I ended up next to the crazy lady. She was certifiable. She laughed at every single line and screamed with laughter every time the 2 dumb black robots were there, or someone or something said bitch. She would seriously orgasm right there. And her kids would run back and forth in front of me and my friend's seat. Plus, it is rare to see people leaving the theater the moment it felt like it was finally going to end. They wanted out of there like me.

    By the way. The twin robots seemed quite racist to me. Exactly how is that humor different from Amos & Andy? They could not read. They were stupid. Their heads looked like monkeys. And one had a gold tooth. If I were African American, I imagine I would not like that at all. :/
    And I found it was highly predictable.



    *****************Possible Spoiler**********************



    I really doubt it though.
    I don't want to ruin the movie experience for anyone. rolleyes
    One such case was the undercover girl robot. Upon her first appearance it was pretty obvious.
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeJul 1st 2009
    Wow. Thank GOD i never planned on watching this!
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
    •  
      CommentAuthorMarselus
    • CommentTimeJul 1st 2009
    omaha wrote
    A baby shit its pants right next to me. The father was holding it and would not change its diaper.

    Fascinating.

    1- Why would a father bring a BABY to a cinema?
    2- Why wouldn´t the same father change the baby´s diaper when the thing gets dirty?

    Two questions we´ll never have the answer to I´m afraid.
    Anything with an orchestra or with a choir....at some point will reach you
    •  
      CommentAuthorThor
    • CommentTimeJul 1st 2009
    omaha, seems to me the problem wasn't so much the film, but the actual cinemagoing experience itself!
    I am extremely serious.
  14. Thor wrote
    omaha, seems to me the problem wasn't so much the film, but the actual cinemagoing experience itself!


    he wasn't a fan of the first movie as well wink
    waaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh