Categories
Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
-
- CommentTimeJun 25th 2009
Steven wrote
I still think Bay might as well have made a porno starring Megan Fox with random action scenes of Transformers in-between sex scenes (or during). That's basically the kind of film Michael Bay wants to make.
Transformers 3: Mikaela makes a SLO MO Run for itwaaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh -
- CommentAuthorAnthony
- CommentTimeJun 25th 2009
...and the kind of film I want. -
- CommentTimeJun 25th 2009
Don't we all?Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders. -
- CommentTimeJun 26th 2009
Steven wrote
I still think Bay might as well have made a porno starring Megan Fox with random action scenes of Transformers in-between sex scenes (or during). That's basically the kind of film Michael Bay wants to make.
I guess Transformers wasn't arty enough...'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn -
- CommentTimeJun 26th 2009
I am sure she reads maintitles'Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders. -
- CommentTimeJun 29th 2009 edited
Astonishing
Transformers: A $201.2-Million Smash In 5-Day Opening
Paramount's Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen came within inches -- well, $2.6 million -- of overtaking last year’s The Dark Knight as the film with the best 5-day opening of all time. According to studio estimates, it grossed $201.2 million versus $203.8 for Warner Bros.’ Knight. The figure included estimated results for Sunday, therefore final actual ticket sales, to be released on Monday, could push the total past Knight’s record mark. Then again, the Los Angeles Times reported that some competing studios estimated that the total will come in closer to $197-199 million. The newspaper said that Paramount spent about $200 million to produce the film and $150-175 million on worldwide marketing and distribution. IMAX, which has been expanding its giant-screen venues (some critics contend that the size of the newer screens is being misrepresented), contributed $14.4 million to the gross. Although IMAX theaters accounted for less than 4 percent of those screening the movie, they nevertheless produced 7.2 percent of the estimated gross.
if you read this, they spend almost as much money on marketing it than making itwaaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh -
- CommentTimeJun 29th 2009
Thomas Glorieux wrote
Astonishing
Transformers: A $201.2-Million Smash In 5-Day Opening
if you read this, they spend almost as much money on marketing it than making it
Which is usually the case with most movies. Just because these special effects heavy blockbusters make big bucks at the box office doesn't mean they turn a profit.
-Erik-host and executive producer of THE CINEMATIC SOUND RADIO PODCAST | www.cinematicsound.net | www.facebook.com/cinematicsound | I HAVE TINNITUS! -
- CommentTimeJun 29th 2009
Erik Woods wrote
Thomas Glorieux wrote
Astonishing
Transformers: A $201.2-Million Smash In 5-Day Opening
if you read this, they spend almost as much money on marketing it than making it
Which is usually the case with most movies. Just because these special effects heavy blockbusters make big bucks at the box office doesn't mean they turn a profit.
-Erik-
indeed, they just won back the money they spend on making it, now they have to earn back their marketing money
But not to worry, DVD and Blu-Ray will do that in the endwaaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh -
- CommentTimeJun 29th 2009
Thomas Glorieux wrote
Erik Woods wrote
Thomas Glorieux wrote
Astonishing
Transformers: A $201.2-Million Smash In 5-Day Opening
if you read this, they spend almost as much money on marketing it than making it
Which is usually the case with most movies. Just because these special effects heavy blockbusters make big bucks at the box office doesn't mean they turn a profit.
-Erik-
indeed, they just won back the money they spend on making it, now they have to earn back their marketing money
But not to worry, DVD and Blu-Ray will do that in the end
And overseas box office, which most of the times save the day to the producers / distributors.Anything with an orchestra or with a choir....at some point will reach you -
- CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
Marselus wrote
Thomas Glorieux wrote
Erik Woods wrote
Thomas Glorieux wrote
Astonishing
Transformers: A $201.2-Million Smash In 5-Day Opening
if you read this, they spend almost as much money on marketing it than making it
Which is usually the case with most movies. Just because these special effects heavy blockbusters make big bucks at the box office doesn't mean they turn a profit.
-Erik-
indeed, they just won back the money they spend on making it, now they have to earn back their marketing money
But not to worry, DVD and Blu-Ray will do that in the end
And overseas box office, which most of the times save the day to the producers / distributors.
yay, we helped Transformers win some money back 2
I would like to help them again, but I don't feel like itwaaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh -
- CommentAuthorPawelStroinski
- CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
I helped them too yesterday. The movie was utterly fun but also utterly stupid. Two dogs humping for 10 minutes? But the fight sceneshttp://www.filmmusic.pl - Polish Film Music Review Website -
- CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
PawelStroinski wrote
I helped them too yesterday. The movie was utterly fun but also utterly stupid. Two dogs humping for 10 minutes? But the fight scenes
ah yes the humping dogs, and that's just the mild rude humour
but the effects are amazing, plus this is one of those movies you absolutely need to see in the cinema. Not only for the big screen, but especially for the ambiance, the laughter of the people. I don't think I'll enjoy the humour of the second as much when I'm watching it home alonewaaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh -
- CommentAuthorPawelStroinski
- CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
John Turturro is absolutely hilarious, but I would cut on the college party scenes (except the Einstein thing). It isn't as breathtaking as the first part, too, if only because it basically stays in tune with the first movie, where some camera setups were just WOW.
Michael Bay should learn that there is something like a STAND. He even moves his camera around when you have an emotional scene. NOT a good idea.http://www.filmmusic.pl - Polish Film Music Review Website -
- CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
PawelStroinski wrote
John Turturro is absolutely hilarious, but I would cut on the college party scenes (except the Einstein thing). It isn't as breathtaking as the first part, too, if only because it basically stays in tune with the first movie, where some camera setups were just WOW.
Michael Bay should learn that there is something like a STAND. He even moves his camera around when you have an emotional scene. NOT a good idea.
that's bay
the first part is indeed too slow and I think it will bore rather quickly when you see it a couple of times
But that first movie will never borewaaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh -
- CommentAuthorPawelStroinski
- CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
It wasn't slow, only badly written.http://www.filmmusic.pl - Polish Film Music Review Website -
- CommentAuthorAnthony
- CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
The only good things about the movie were Megan Fox and Isabel Lucas. -
- CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
Anthony wrote
The only good things about the movie were Megan Fox and Isabel Lucas.
ah yes Isabel Lucas, cute cute and cute
a dangerous combinationwaaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh -
- CommentAuthorAnthony
- CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
Thomas Glorieux wrote
Anthony wrote
The only good things about the movie were Megan Fox and Isabel Lucas.
ah yes Isabel Lucas, cute cute and cute
a dangerous combination
I would do disgusting, beautiful things to her... -
- CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
Anthony wrote
Thomas Glorieux wrote
Anthony wrote
The only good things about the movie were Megan Fox and Isabel Lucas.
ah yes Isabel Lucas, cute cute and cute
a dangerous combination
I would do disgusting, beautiful things to her...
perhaps disgusting is beautiful for herwaaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh -
- CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
Anthony wrote
Thomas Glorieux wrote
Anthony wrote
The only good things about the movie were Megan Fox and Isabel Lucas.
ah yes Isabel Lucas, cute cute and cute
a dangerous combination
I would do disgusting, beautiful things to her...
I would destroy her.
Therapy's going great by the way. -
- CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
Steven wrote
Therapy's going great by the way.
I'm so glad for youwaaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh -
- CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
Thanks. It's the support that gets me through it. -
- CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
Steven wrote
Thanks. It's the support that gets me through it.
waaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh -
- CommentTimeJul 1st 2009
Going to see it now.
I'm really tired though. I've gotten about three each night for the past couple of nights. I hope I can make it through.
Poor Megan Fox. If she was ever locked in a room with ANY guy.
-
- CommentTimeJul 1st 2009
The fact that such a movie gathers all this debate, is a sign of our cinematic times i guess?Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders. -
- CommentTimeJul 1st 2009 edited
God awful. It was absolute torture. Could have cut out about 40 minutes. It had a good 30 seconds I'd say.
Anyway, worst movie experience of my life. Surrounded by people talking to the movie and clapping their hands. A baby shit its pants right next to me. The father was holding it and would not change its diaper. It got unbearable and I had to move. Then I ended up next to the crazy lady. She was certifiable. She laughed at every single line and screamed with laughter every time the 2 dumb black robots were there, or someone or something said bitch. She would seriously orgasm right there. And her kids would run back and forth in front of me and my friend's seat. Plus, it is rare to see people leaving the theater the moment it felt like it was finally going to end. They wanted out of there like me.
By the way. The twin robots seemed quite racist to me. Exactly how is that humor different from Amos & Andy? They could not read. They were stupid. Their heads looked like monkeys. And one had a gold tooth. If I were African American, I imagine I would not like that at all. :/
And I found it was highly predictable.
*****************Possible Spoiler**********************
I really doubt it though.
I don't want to ruin the movie experience for anyone.
One such case was the undercover girl robot. Upon her first appearance it was pretty obvious. -
- CommentTimeJul 1st 2009
Wow. Thank GOD i never planned on watching this!Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders. -
- CommentTimeJul 1st 2009
omaha wrote
A baby shit its pants right next to me. The father was holding it and would not change its diaper.
Fascinating.
1- Why would a father bring a BABY to a cinema?
2- Why wouldn´t the same father change the baby´s diaper when the thing gets dirty?
Two questions we´ll never have the answer to I´m afraid.Anything with an orchestra or with a choir....at some point will reach you -
- CommentTimeJul 1st 2009
omaha, seems to me the problem wasn't so much the film, but the actual cinemagoing experience itself!I am extremely serious. -
- CommentTimeJul 1st 2009
Thor wrote
omaha, seems to me the problem wasn't so much the film, but the actual cinemagoing experience itself!
he wasn't a fan of the first movie as wellwaaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh