register

  • Categories

Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

 

New MovieScore Media CD: THE DESCENT - PART 2 (David Julyan)

General Discussions » New MovieScore Media CD: THE DESCENT - PART 2 (David Julyan) (Posts 1 to 18 of 18)

  1.  
    •  
      CommentAuthormoviescore
    • CommentTimeJan 5th 2010
    MovieScore Media presents

    THE DESCENT: PART 2
    Music Composed by
    DAVID JULYAN

    Sound clips and more info:
    http://www.moviescoremedia.com/descent2.html

    CD distributed by Screen Archives Entertainment:
    http://www.screenarchives.com/title_det … PRE-ORDER/

    Download album in 320kbit mp3 format here:
    http://www.payloadz.com/go?id=1184850

    Download album on iTunes here:
    http://itunes.apple.com/gb/album/the-de … d345572663

    "David Julyan’s score is fantastic, it really elevates this picture, from the haunting melody playing over the opening aerial shots to the end credits – its great and it will stay with you long after the film is over.” - Filmtwats.com

    Composer David Julyan returns to the claustrophobic mines of the hugely successful 2005 horror film The Descent and develops the ominous and powerful musical landscape he created for the first film. The Descent scores are both great examples of Julyan’s very ambitious and detailed meld of acoustic and electronic music and the second score is exciting in its use of modern, aleatoric techniques within the orchestra in conjunction with eerie “under-your-skin” sound design.

    Anyone who enjoyed the score for the first Descent movie will undoubtedly love the music for Part 2. The film itself opened in UK theatres on December 2, opens in several territories co-inciding with our release and is expected to be released in the US in 2010.

    Track titles:
    1 Mountain Opening 0.54
    2 Sarah Freaks Out 3.31
    3 What Happened 1.56
    4 Cath and the Crawler 2.54
    5 Drive to Chapel Mine 1.08
    6 Exploring the Mine 3.14
    7 Pursuing Vaines 3.36
    8 Cath Is Trapped 2.16
    9 Attack and Fall 2.31
    10 Alone in the Cave 1.10
    11 Juno Returns 1.40
    12 Rios Leaves a Message 2.09
    13 The Pit 3.51
    14 The Rock Bridge 3.06
    15 The Feeding Chamber 2.59
    16 The Descent: Part 2 4.03

    MMS10001 THE DESCENT: PART 2 (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack)
    Music Composed by DAVID JULYAN
    Release date (CD/download): January 5, 2009

    NOTE: With The Descent: Part 2, MovieScore Magazine changes its default CD packaging from digipaks to regular jewel cases. By public demand!
  2. if it's as good as the first, I'm sold smile
    waaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeJan 5th 2010
    I can't wait to hear this!
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
    • CommentAuthorJoep
    • CommentTimeJan 5th 2010
    Welcome jewel cases!
  5. I love reading positive score reviews from film reviewers, but how seriously can we take a website called "Film twats"? biggrin
    http://www.filmmusic.pl - Polish Film Music Review Website
    •  
      CommentAuthorMartijn
    • CommentTimeJan 5th 2010 edited
    moviescore wrote
    NOTE: With The Descent: Part 2, MovieScore Magazine changes its default CD packaging from digipaks to regular jewel cases. By public demand!


    Yay!
    smile smile smile
    bhangra
    'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeJan 5th 2010
    This was announced some time back. Glad to see the jewel cases chime in again! Brings hope that there are still people in the world who like to listen to actual CD's instead of crappy mp3s.
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
    • CommentAuthorTimmer
    • CommentTimeJan 5th 2010
    I couldn't agree more. beer
    On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeJan 5th 2010
    It's very depressing to talk with people of younger generations...for instance, my brother who is 15, saw me listening to CD's today in the hi-fi and asked me (with a bit of irony): "Why are you still bothering with older technologies? We live in the world of digital technology, why are you still bothering with the CD? And i asked him what "digital technology" is only to get the reply : " the mp3".

    (he's only 15 he doesn't know CD is digital yet, but he doesn't bother at all from what i've seen)
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
    • CommentAuthorTimmer
    • CommentTimeJan 5th 2010 edited
    Bless him wink beer

    I suspect that at 15 he thinks he knows it all.
    On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeJan 5th 2010
    Yes, but he and all of his age don't practically use CD's anymore. It's the ipod - mp3 generation. It's depressing to know that when these folks take over, none of them will resist to an all-digital-release scheme in the near future, regardless the musical genre.

    Let's hope that some of them when they grow up, they'll discover older technologies and realize their grace (like me with the lp's now, which - when i was 15, i would have basically the same reaction as my brother on).
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemonStar
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2010
    A few of my former classmates actually told me 128 kbps MP3s sound better than CDs. slant
  13. DemonStar wrote
    A few of my former classmates actually told me 128 kbps MP3s sound better than CDs. slant

    This may be a stupid question (and if it is feel free to move this to the "stupid" topic), but can there be differences in the quality of a (for example) 128 kbps mp3 file that's compressed from the same source but using different compression software to produce the mp3?
    The views expressed in this post are entirely my own and do not reflect the opinions of maintitles.net, or for that matter, anyone else. http://www.racksandtags.com/falkirkbairn
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2010
    Yeap. There are freeware codecs and there are payware codecs that cost hundreds of dollars and they all work on the same principle but with much much better algorithms (the expensive ones) which do a much more careful chopping up of the frequencies in an analogue wave file. But in essence, it's always a chopping up. It's a matter of who does it better.

    And it's not a stupid question at all my friend smile
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
  15. The reason I ask is that there are some 256 kbps mp3s (for example) that, to me, sound really good and "full", whereas others do show their limitations.
    The views expressed in this post are entirely my own and do not reflect the opinions of maintitles.net, or for that matter, anyone else. http://www.racksandtags.com/falkirkbairn
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2010
    It does happen, that's very true. But on general lines, a heavily chopped up mp3 (as the 128kbps ones for instance) will always remain mediocre, no matter the algorithm and methods used to be produced.
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
    •  
      CommentAuthorMartijn
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2010
    Well, you also always have to consider the source: garbage in = garbage out.
    'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemonStar
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2010
    To be honest, I think the MP3s gotten from Amazon.com, although they have lower bitrate and frequency response, sound sharper and have more clarity than the AACs from iTunes.

1 to 18 of 18

  1.