• Categories

Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

 
    •  
      CommentAuthorThor
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2008
    Anthony wrote
    Wow, season 3 has beeen out on DVD in the UK for nearly 6 months! I didn't realise it was so far behind everywhere else! shocked


    Season 4 just started up here in Norway as well. The US is always several MONTHS ahead, so it's important to have that in mind when commenting on an ongoing series.
    I am extremely serious.
    •  
      CommentAuthorThor
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2008 edited
    Marselus wrote
    All this stuff about the quality of film music today is pointless and absurd. Film music today is as good (or better) than in previous decades.


    I agree with this, although you would need an article to define what is really meant with "film music today" and "good/better". These are both vague terms that need serious specification.
    I am extremely serious.
    •  
      CommentAuthorMarselus
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2008
    Thor wrote
    Marselus wrote
    All this stuff about the quality of film music today is pointless and absurd. Film music today is as good (or better) than in previous decades.


    I agree with this, although you would need an article to define what is really meant with "film music today" and "good/better". These are both vague terms that need serious specification.

    For "film music today" I mean since the mid nineties until today basically.
    Anything with an orchestra or with a choir....at some point will reach you
    •  
      CommentAuthorThor
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2008 edited
    Marselus wrote
    For "film music today" I mean since the mid nineties until today basically.


    Yeah, but it's not only a matter of period, but also what paradigm you're talking about. Classical-style Hollywood films, Hong Kong movies, Experimental Bulgarian films, Bollywood, Japanese animé....you name it.

    That's my problem with Zimmer's statement (or any broad generalization). They lack nuance.
    I am extremely serious.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSouthall
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2008
    Another point always worth making is that changing patterns in film scoring can't really be considered in isolation - changing patterns in films are also important. ("Why can't anyone write a score like Chinatown any more?" "Nobody makes a film like Chinatown any more.")
    •  
      CommentAuthorMarselus
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2008
    Thor wrote
    Marselus wrote
    For "film music today" I mean since the mid nineties until today basically.


    Yeah, but it's not only a matter of period, but also what paradigm you're talking about. Classical-style Hollywood films, Hong Kong movies, Experimental Bulgarian films, Bollywood, Japanese animé....you name it.

    That's my problem with Zimmer's statement (or any broad generalization). They lack nuance.

    That´s precisely why I don´t agree with Zimmer´s statement or the "film music is almost dead" one that we read very often. Just because most of hollywood blockbusters (not all, actually) are scored in the laziest and cheapest way does not mean we have to generalise.
    Anything with an orchestra or with a choir....at some point will reach you
    •  
      CommentAuthorMarselus
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2008
    Southall wrote
    Another point always worth making is that changing patterns in film scoring can't really be considered in isolation - changing patterns in films are also important. ("Why can't anyone write a score like Chinatown any more?" "Nobody makes a film like Chinatown any more.")

    That´s one of the keys IMO.
    Anything with an orchestra or with a choir....at some point will reach you
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2008
    Perhaps it's partially a case of nostalgia? Those who grew up in a certain period often look back at it with a certain fondness and remember only the good things. Maybe it's the same thing with scores? Maybe there was a lot of crap back then too? Scores are more easily available these days than they've ever been which is another factor to take into account.

    I don't think scores in general are as good as the classics of old, but I don't think it's as bad as it's sometimes made out to be.
    • CommentAuthorAnthony
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2008 edited
    It must be nostalgia! When I only had a few John Powell scores like The Italian Job and Paycheck I was incredibly happy with his work. Since I became a big fan (around when Mr. & Mrs. Smith came out) nothing has beaten his older works in my opinion. Although I must now say Horton has become incredibly close. Weird. dizzy
  1. Anthony wrote
    Wow, season 3 has beeen out on DVD in the UK for nearly 6 months! I didn't realise it was so far behind everywhere else! shocked

    Do you go straight to season 4 or do you have to wait?


    There's no season four start date confirmed yet. I guess I have to wait at least until the end of the year.
    • CommentAuthorAnthony
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2008
    Antineutrino wrote
    Anthony wrote
    Wow, season 3 has beeen out on DVD in the UK for nearly 6 months! I didn't realise it was so far behind everywhere else! shocked

    Do you go straight to season 4 or do you have to wait?


    There's no season four start date confirmed yet. I guess I have to wait at least until the end of the year.


    Ouch. I guess it takes time to translate it and everything?
  2. I guess dubbing takes a bit of time, but not that long. Most movies here are released in cinema at the same time as in the US or UK.

    I think it has more to do with the not very good audience rate. slant
    •  
      CommentAuthorMarselus
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2008 edited
    Antineutrino wrote
    I think it has more to do with the not very good audience rate. slant

    This happened in Spain too. The rates were good for the first season, but the second and the third didn´t make good audience. In fact, the show was scheduled in a secondary channel for season 3.
    Anything with an orchestra or with a choir....at some point will reach you
    •  
      CommentAuthormoviescore
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2008
    Southall wrote
    I agree with your sentiment but I took the original comments to mean "in major Hollywood movies". You can find wonderful film music today, but you have to make an effort to find it. If you're going to the cinema to watch the latest blockbuster, chances are it's scored by Remote Control and so falls into the criticisms as mentioned by that facility's head honcho.


    For the record, I was also referring to this discussion in the major mainstream context. I wouldn't run my soundtrack label if I didn't believe that there is tons of great music written for films, so I agree with you on that point - however, most of the music written for the big, influential film, is sadly not very interesting these days. And, again, the guy who seems to worry so much about it is also one to blame!

    mc
    • CommentAuthorAnthony
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2008
    How do you start a soundtrack label? As much as I'd love to do it I know it will never happen, but I'm interested none the least. Money and an artist? smile
  3. Southall wrote
    Another point always worth making is that changing patterns in film scoring can't really be considered in isolation - changing patterns in films are also important. ("Why can't anyone write a score like Chinatown any more?" "Nobody makes a film like Chinatown any more.")


    On one hand yes. On the other hand, a bit different version of that jazzy convention (though more rooting in an earlier score, namely Leonard Bernstein's "On the Waterfront") are written for films like The Black Dahlia or LA Confidential.

    We have to remember that the old conventions may still live along. And modernizing them too much may end up with something like Tyler's Rambo, where something that is supposed (in some way, I think Tyler planned out a homage) to be a modern version of Jerry Goldsmith ends up to sound like (simplification to get across with a point) Tears of the Sun with Goldsmith's theme.

    It's of course quite easy to criticize film scoring of today and Zimmer, wants it or not, IS in some way responsible for that, though really I wouldn't demonize his part in it. RC composers are something like "Zimmer for the poorer" and they are asked, because people want that kind of sound and either can't afford or can't warrant Zimmer's interest. He would be the first to say that they should start out branching into their OWN voices, which was particularly well shown in the way he started out John Powell's career always trying to get him jobs that fits Powell's style (I guess that influence ended as far as Chicken Run though). To some extent that's also how he made Harry Gregson-Williams' career work out - getting the best of what he has best. I wouldn't sense bad intentions with Zimmer. I guess the thing is really about what are they given than what he does to them. Zimmer is responsible for the factory called Remote Control/Media Ventures/Whatever Else It May Be Called in the Future. What he is NOT responsible for are the producers' minds. If we want people like Giacchino to do worthy blockbusters, we should rather concentrate on wondering why don't producers give jobs to people like that (bitter comment which I am close to sometimes would mention that Giacchino and other talented composers are just TOO GOOD for the producers' liking, that's Hollywood for God's sake and what else could we expect). Zimmer gets the best from the situation we have at hand. And for that we can't blame him, I think.
    http://www.filmmusic.pl - Polish Film Music Review Website
    • CommentAuthorTimmer
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2008
    moviescore wrote
    Thomas wrote
    Hans Zimmer, who wrote the music for the Hollywood box-office hits Gladiator and The Lion King, dismissed the majority of contemporary screen compositions as unmemorable. “They drift around like cows grazing. So many scores sound like nobody really thought about them.”


    shocked

    H-y-p-o-c-r-i-c-y!

    mc


    My thought exactly!
    On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt
    •  
      CommentAuthorScribe
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2008
    wink
    Timmer wrote
    moviescore wrote
    Thomas wrote
    Hans Zimmer, who wrote the music for the Hollywood box-office hits Gladiator and The Lion King, dismissed the majority of contemporary screen compositions as unmemorable. “They drift around like cows grazing. So many scores sound like nobody really thought about them.”


    shocked

    H-y-p-o-c-r-i-c-y!

    mc


    My thought exactly!


    Well, you can't say that about many of the scores of Zimmer himself. And you can't give him too much blame for the doings of his students once they're composing their own scores...Zimmer himself is quoted as calling them something along the lines of "bastards."
    I love you all. Never change. Well, unless you want to!
    •  
      CommentAuthoromaha
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2008
    Scribe wrote
    wink
    Timmer wrote
    moviescore wrote
    Thomas wrote
    Hans Zimmer, who wrote the music for the Hollywood box-office hits Gladiator and The Lion King, dismissed the majority of contemporary screen compositions as unmemorable. “They drift around like cows grazing. So many scores sound like nobody really thought about them.”


    shocked

    H-y-p-o-c-r-i-c-y!

    mc


    My thought exactly!


    Well, you can't say that about many of the scores of Zimmer himself. And you can't give him too much blame for the doings of his students once they're composing their own scores...Zimmer himself is quoted as calling them something along the lines of "bastards."


    Haha! Me too!
  4. Southall wrote
    Another point always worth making is that changing patterns in film scoring can't really be considered in isolation - changing patterns in films are also important. ("Why can't anyone write a score like Chinatown any more?" "Nobody makes a film like Chinatown any more.")


    Indeed, hardly anyone made a film like CHINATOWN then either!
    A butterfly thinks therefore I am
  5. I find it myself more and more difficult to appreciate the scores of today, I grew up with all the classics of the time, Superman, Star Wars, Willow, Star Trek, the numerous truly original scores by the great Jerry Goldsmith, the fantastic James Horner in his prime, the truly unbeatable John Williams who is for me the best film composer of all time, for giving me unforgettable themes and music that makes my body hair stand up (the period 1977-1983 is his most brilliant). Nothing that is coming out these days even comes close to these landmark scores.

    Though there is some exceptional talent at work today: M. Giacchino is the greatest talent and one that can live up to the legendary status of some of those I mentioned.

    I admit most music nowadays sounds very forced, unfocused and seriously unmelodic. Where are the grand sweeping scores of the time, which accompanied the movie as if it was a character in itself? Last I remember are The Lord of the Rings symphonies, but what has come out since then, not much that truly makes me sit up and notice.

    For me this goes along with my affection toward the awesome sound of J. Horner in the eighties and during the nineties but the totally blandness of most of his scores during this decade. That totally sums up how much I care or don't care about the film scores we're offered lately.

    Maybe it's to do with how spoiled we get as film music fans as the years go by. Maybe newer fans appreciate the modern music more as they have not heard as much as us veterans. Or maybe composers just don't get inspired at all anymore by all the nonsense we keep seeing in the theaters.
    "considering I've seen an enormous debate here about The Amazing Spider-Man and the ones who love it, and the ones who hate it, I feel myself obliged to say: TASTE DIFFERS, DEAL WITH IT" - Thomas G.
    •  
      CommentAuthoromaha
    • CommentTimeMar 18th 2008
    DreamTheater wrote


    Maybe it's to do with how spoiled we get as film music fans as the years go by. Maybe newer fans appreciate the modern music more as they have not heard as much as us veterans. Or maybe composers just don't get inspired at all anymore by all the nonsense we keep seeing in the theaters.


    Very interesting. The question is, how can we get these new fans to apprec. the veteran style of scoring?
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeMar 18th 2008 edited
    DemonStar wrote
    Very well said, IMO! wink


    No, it is not, at all.

    Those views come based on the relatively small percentage of film music's output that mostly comes from the USA and large parts of it from - and here's the hypocrisy - Zimmer's own studios, with composers like Geof Zanelli and Atli Örvarsson just to name but a couple who are largely responsible for the easily digestible and fast-good nature of this part of film music which accompanies movies of equally low quality.

    Apparently - and i would bet large amounts of money on this, people who are expressing these views haven't ever dedicated a single minute to the music of Philippe Rombi, Alberto Iglesias, Gabriel Yared, Alexandre Desplat, Dario Marianelli, Michael Giacchino, Joe Hisaishi, Tuomas Kantelinen, Osvaldo Golijov, David Shire, Joel McNeely, all with very recent examples of pure excellence in film music.

    Apparently, these people judge and generalize based on a handful of specific composers' work which is in their mind and - excuse me, but nobody can convince me on the non-existence of deeper, personal benefits from such statements and their corresponding subjectivity.

    The Zimmers and every Zimmer of the world and their logic's fans, can always seek and find out ways to adjust and improve the said situation with originality and fresh ideas that can boost and enhance the genre since they have the means indeed and if they're so unsatisfied with it instead of sitting and bitching about their colleagues' works when at the same time they produce works of as - or even lower - questionable quality themselves as well. You're not even allowed to whine and bitch about either people's work when you're producing cheap stuff like the simpsons movie and at the same time working on "Kung Fu Panda", imo.
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
    •  
      CommentAuthorThomas
    • CommentTimeMar 18th 2008 edited
    Can you explain where's the difference between Hans Zimmer scoring Kung Fu Panda and, for example Christopher Lennertz scoring crap like Meet the Spartans? Why is Lennertz praised and Zimmer bashed? confused

    Also, it's ok that you don't like the Simpsons score but please, it's not a scientific fact... rolleyes
    •  
      CommentAuthorSouthall
    • CommentTimeMar 18th 2008
    Thomas wrote
    Can you explain where's the difference between Hans Zimmer scoring Kung Fu Panda and, for example Christopher Lennertz scoring crap like Meet the Spartans? Why is Lennertz praised and Zimmer bashed? confused


    I suspect... and this is not a scientific fact... that it's because Zimmer chooses to take easy money, work on easy projects, and provide easy scores, when he's capable of so much more. Lennertz is just starting out so has to take what he can.
    • CommentAuthorAnthony
    • CommentTimeMar 18th 2008
    Let's just say I know someone who loves all the RC guys. When I told him ''OMGZORZ - Lost season 3 is coming out!!'' he actually said (seriously too), ''Oh Lost gets all these releases, but it's been the same from the beginning! Why won't they release Desperate Housewives? That's so much better!''.

    shocked
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeMar 18th 2008 edited
    Thomas, let's be a bit objective man; seriously.

    1) Lennertz is at the beginning of his career and has already written some very promising stuff like GUN and his Medal of Honor material and he's a very honest artist at what he does, no hiding behind his own little finger. He tries to be inventive at most of the times and he's a hell of nice person and a fine professional - from what i know, not going around talking bad about his colleagues and also a very respected and beloved one in his circles.

    2) While all the above is true, it is still irrelevant as you won't see him in my list of composers above.

    You tell me know, please, WHAT EXACTLY in the last 5 years or so justifies Zimmer or any Zimmer to GENERALIZE ignorantly like that and self-putting himself about his colleagues like that? Colleagues that actually try and offer fresh, inventive and - in some cases like Rombi's Angel or Hisaishi's The Story of the Great King and the Four Gods - truly magnificent music instead of thousand times-heard and generic material like the stuff Zimmer's been offering lately? Or - for the matter of fact, rants?

    I've told again in the past and i will say it again now, every composer who goes against his colleages for no apparent reason -especially someone at the status and - let's face it, power of Zimmer, in unprofessional and egoistical ways is something i cannot sympathize with, nor appreciate, at all.

    What places him above the others is what i'd like to hear, apart the fact that some people are blind fans apparently; i want to hear honest and objective views here in a clean debate, not the same stuff all over again.

    As for Anne Dudley, i won't even bother commenting on her contributions of late.
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
    •  
      CommentAuthorThomas
    • CommentTimeMar 18th 2008
    Christodoulides wrote
    You tell me know, please, WHAT EXACTLY in the last 5 years or so justifies Zimmer or any Zimmer to GENERALIZE ignorantly like that and self-putting himself about his colleagues like that?


    Pirates 3, The Holiday, The Da Vinci Code, Spanglish, Matchstick Men, The Last Samurai.
    Where does he "ignorantly generalize"? I bet if John Williams have said the same he would be praised as the saviour of film music.
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeMar 18th 2008
    No, it wouldn't. As to why 'ignorantly' read the 2nd paragraph of my initial post.
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeMar 18th 2008
    As for the examples you posted:

    Pirates 3: good ol' fun but nothing more groundbreaking than other equally good scores released at the time.

    The Holiday: is that REALLY so worthy and original? Me thinks not; not even close. Spanglish is sweet and nostalgic but that doesn't put him above any other either. Same goes for Matchstick Men. People like Roque Banos and Rombi for instance - or even Mark McKenzie - write significantly more beautiful stuff than that all the time but go below the radar for apparent reasons.

    The Da Vinci code and The Last Samurai are excellent film music indeed but i doubt anyone would factually consider them to have anything more than - say Rombi's Angel or Desplat's material or Marianelli's Atonement apart the biggest name-stamp apparently.
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.