Categories
Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
[Closed] What's annoying you currently? (Complaining now banned)
-
- CommentAuthorsdtom
- CommentTimeMay 26th 2009
I'm actually in favor of a lot stricter laws for drunk driving i.e. automatic jail time. There is no excuse for drinking and driving. I've also proposed that the fine for talking on a cell phone without headset should be 8 hours of trash pickup on our polluted looking freeway system. People might not do it if that was the fine.
Thomaslisten to more classical music! -
- CommentAuthorDemetris
- CommentTimeMay 26th 2009 edited
Southall wrote
sdtom wrote
Steven wrote
Atham wrote
I was only doing 68 Kms in a 60 km zone. They're harsh here in Australia!
I feel for you buddy.
That's ridiculous, $200 for that!? Now that's unjust. They should take into account the severity of the speeding and any past fines you may or may not have got to make a properly weighed and just prosecution rather than that bullshit.
The problem that I have is the general attitude. Speeding is wrong no matter what unless the people want to change the law.
Thomas
While speeding is against the law, I wouldn't agree that it is automatically wrong. It depends on the circumstances, of course, but most motoring accidents occur in slow-moving traffic. In an urban area then there's no question that the speed limit should be low and people should stick to it - but I struggle to see who the victim is (and therefore why it's any more "wrong" than recording a program off tv and passing it to my friend to watch, which is also illegal) if I choose to drive at 80mph rather than 70mph on a non-busy stretch of motorway. It's virtually unheard of to hit another car when traveling at speed - most accidents are as a result of burst tyres. And frankly in that case it's not likely to make much difference what speed you're doing if it's more than 50 or so.
Indeed. Doing 50km/h and being careless in the busy and narrow streets of a city, can get you or anyone else that will be as unlucky as to find himself on your path - killed.
Martijn (and everyone) what is the speed limit at large highways where you live?
Where i live, it's like that: (cyprus/greece)
Residential areas: 50 / 60-65 km/h
Large highways around cities: 100/110 km/h
Large highways well outside cities and in the country-side: 100 / 130 km/hLove Maintitles. It's full of Wanders. -
- CommentAuthorMarselus
- CommentTimeMay 26th 2009
Martijn wrote
As to James' point: we are experimenting in The Netherlands with variable speed limits...and it confused the hell out of EVERYBODY
Exactly the same here in Catalonia. Variable speed limits.....screw them, just another poor excuse to fine as many drivers as possible.Anything with an orchestra or with a choir....at some point will reach you -
- CommentAuthorDemetris
- CommentTimeMay 26th 2009
sdtom wrote
I'm actually in favor of a lot stricter laws for drunk driving i.e. automatic jail time. There is no excuse for drinking and driving. I've also proposed that the fine for talking on a cell phone without headset should be 8 hours of trash pickup on our polluted looking freeway system. People might not do it if that was the fine.
Thomas
That is true. Drinking and driving and cell-phones are HUGE dangers for all of us, pedestrians and drivers on the streets.Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders. -
- CommentAuthorTimmer
- CommentTimeMay 26th 2009
Christodoulides wrote
sdtom wrote
I'm actually in favor of a lot stricter laws for drunk driving i.e. automatic jail time. There is no excuse for drinking and driving. I've also proposed that the fine for talking on a cell phone without headset should be 8 hours of trash pickup on our polluted looking freeway system. People might not do it if that was the fine.
Thomas
That is true. Drinking and driving and cell-phones are HUGE dangers for all of us, pedestrians and drivers on the streets.
No shit Sherlock.On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt -
- CommentAuthorMartijn
- CommentTimeMay 26th 2009
sdtom wrote
I'm actually in favor of a lot stricter laws for drunk driving i.e. automatic jail time.
Hear, bloody hear!
James, the reason I think speeding limits should be enforced is not because I think it's a "victim crime", but because I *strongly* feel the general motorist' mindset should be on safety AT ALL TIMES.
You're driving a ton of steel with an incredible speed.
It's a potential weapon that imbues the driver with awesome power...and an awesome responsibility.
I'm not so starry-eyed that I'm not aware that it's a neat little cash-cow as well, but at the end of the day, when motorists will in fact become more aware of what they're doing and what limits they should strictly adhere to to at least provide a modicum of safety, that's all that matters to me.'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn -
- CommentAuthorsdtom
- CommentTimeMay 26th 2009
The problem is that people agree with me but still go out and do it and we let them get away with it to a certain degree. Case in this argument. Soccer mom, three kids, and on the way to pick them up had two glasses of wine (under the blood alchohol limit) strikes down and kills a 70 year old woman crossing the street. She tried to stop but couldn't. Did the small amount of alcohol impair her just enough? She did no time and still drives. I think the law is wrong.
Thomaslisten to more classical music! -
- CommentAuthorSteven
- CommentTimeMay 26th 2009
sdtom wrote
Steven wrote
Atham wrote
I was only doing 68 Kms in a 60 km zone. They're harsh here in Australia!
I feel for you buddy.
That's ridiculous, $200 for that!? Now that's unjust. They should take into account the severity of the speeding and any past fines you may or may not have got to make a properly weighed and just prosecution rather than that bullshit.
The problem that I have is the general attitude. Speeding is wrong no matter what unless the people want to change the law.
Thomas
Yes, speeding is wrong, I agree Tom. But it's not always as black and white as that. In my case, I got caught doing 37 in a 30 zone which was not clearly marked as being a 30 zone, just a camera sign. The road itself is a three lane main road, so I assumed it was a 40 zone (plus it was midnight, so there were no cars around to help get an idea of the general speed limit). I got a fine of £60 and three points on my license for three years. Perhaps if the fine was a little less excessive, I wouldn't have minded. But certainly having the points was far too harsh if you ask me, especially considering insurance for my age group is expensive enough as it is here in Britain. Thankfully I get a chance to do the course to wipe them from my license, but that's still costing me £72 and three hours of my life I'd much rather spend somewhere else. And I'm not a dangerous driver, I'm actually calmer behind the wheel than most other times (which you'll just have to take my word for), so getting penalized to this degree for such an ephemeral and small offense does seem a little unfair (even if it's something the government would have no way of knowing).
Another point, I think 70MPH is way too slow for the national speed limit. Speeding is not the problem, it's people's driving attitudes that somehow needs to be changed. The way you're taught to drive in England is very skewed IMO. It's more about how to simply pass the test rather than necessarily teaching you to be a good driver. And of course drink driving is a crime worthy of sever punishment, I completely agree. -
- CommentAuthorTimmer
- CommentTimeMay 26th 2009
You could go round and round(abouts)* on this argument but Steven just made some very valid points. The driving test doesn't teach you how to drive on Britains roads and speed sign are often in places that lead me to think it's no more than a stealth tax.
*sorry
On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt -
- CommentAuthorDemetris
- CommentTimeMay 26th 2009 edited
Timmer wrote
You could go round and round(abouts)* on this argument but Steven just made some very valid points. The driving test doesn't teach you how to drive on Britains roads and speed sign are often in places that lead me to think it's no more than a stealth tax.
*sorry
Well, it's like this in the rest of Europe as well. Unfortunately.Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders. -
- CommentAuthorSouthall
- CommentTimeMay 26th 2009
Martijn wrote
sdtom wrote
I'm actually in favor of a lot stricter laws for drunk driving i.e. automatic jail time.
Hear, bloody hear!
No argument with that. It's wonderful that attitudes have changed so much over the last couple of decades, but there are still some morons who drink and drive. They should certainly get automatic jail time. And using mobile phones (and for that matter smoking or eating or reaching into far corners of the car to retrieve a CD or something) is frighteningly distracting to drivers and I wish those laws were actually enforced.
James, the reason I think speeding limits should be enforced is not because I think it's a "victim crime", but because I *strongly* feel the general motorist' mindset should be on safety AT ALL TIMES.
I entirely agree with your desire for people to drive more responsibly - I think my disagreement is with your assumption that driving faster than the speed limit means driving less safely. Speed limits on Britain's roads were generally set immediately after the second world war. They're just not appropriate any more. If you're going to have strict enforcement, then you've got to make sure you're enforcing sensible speed limits. There's a two-mile stretch of road near where I grew up which had a 30mph limit despite having no houses on it, no school, no parks, hardly even any bends, no pedestrians (it basically just links one trunk road with another) - yet it did (of course) have two speed cameras on it. 60mph was an appropriate limit, not 30mph - and the culture of speeding being acceptable comes from that type of road, where the actual speed limit is so absurdly low.
I'm not so starry-eyed that I'm not aware that it's a neat little cash-cow as well, but at the end of the day, when motorists will in fact become more aware of what they're doing and what limits they should strictly adhere to to at least provide a modicum of safety, that's all that matters to me.
So many people over here think it's a neat little cash-cow, but as with anything relating to public services in this country, there is so much inefficiency built into the system that I'm sure it ends up costing considerably more than it raises. -
- CommentAuthorsdtom
- CommentTimeMay 26th 2009
I'll guarantee you the amount of revenue generated in California is staggering.listen to more classical music! -
- CommentAuthorFalkirkBairn
- CommentTimeMay 27th 2009
Another thing to consider when talking about speed limits and the speed at which you drive is that the faster you drive the less time you have to react to the idiots on the road that we sometimes come across.
I remember when seatbelts were made compulsory in the UK there was someone adamant that they would not wear a seatbelt because they were good enough drivers that they would not get themselves into the situation where they would need to be restrained. They failed to consider the behaviour of other road users.
Keeping speeds down gives you a better chance of reacting in time to whatever happens on the road - though driving within the speed limit may still not be enough to react to what's happening on the road.The views expressed in this post are entirely my own and do not reflect the opinions of maintitles.net, or for that matter, anyone else. http://www.racksandtags.com/falkirkbairn -
- CommentAuthorSouthall
- CommentTimeMay 27th 2009
A slightly controversial opinion, perhaps, but still - if people were good enough drivers then we wouldn't need speed limits at all - people could just judge the conditions for themselves and make their own mind up. As I said before, the driving test should be considerably harder. If it meant only 5% of people passed it, then so be it. It's by far the best way of making the roads safer. -
- CommentAuthorWilliam
- CommentTimeMay 27th 2009
Stavroula wrote
My boyfriend annoys me! And none of you ask me why because I'm really going to
!!!
My girlfriend probably feels the same about me.
-
- CommentAuthorSteven
- CommentTimeMay 27th 2009
William wrote
Stavroula wrote
My boyfriend annoys me! And none of you ask me why because I'm really going to
!!!
My girlfriend probably feels the same about me.
Same with my hoes. -
- CommentAuthorTimmer
- CommentTimeMay 27th 2009
^
Get ploughing then boy
On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt -
- CommentAuthorLSH
- CommentTimeMay 27th 2009
Timmer wrote
LSH wrote
Flying back home on Saturday.
But, boy, what a fantastic eight months it's been.
Doesn't time fly

Tell me about it! The last six or so weeks have been particularly and unforgettably awesome.
-
- CommentAuthorsdtom
- CommentTimeMay 27th 2009
FalkirkBairn wrote
Another thing to consider when talking about speed limits and the speed at which you drive is that the faster you drive the less time you have to react to the idiots on the road that we sometimes come across.
I remember when seatbelts were made compulsory in the UK there was someone adamant that they would not wear a seatbelt because they were good enough drivers that they would not get themselves into the situation where they would need to be restrained. They failed to consider the behaviour of other road users.
Keeping speeds down gives you a better chance of reacting in time to whatever happens on the road - though driving within the speed limit may still not be enough to react to what's happening on the road.
We're all in such a hurry today.
Thomaslisten to more classical music! -
- CommentAuthorMartijn
- CommentTimeMay 27th 2009
Southall wrote
A slightly controversial opinion, perhaps, but still - if people were good enough drivers then we wouldn't need speed limits at all - people could just judge the conditions for themselves and make their own mind up. As I said before, the driving test should be considerably harder. If it meant only 5% of people passed it, then so be it. It's by far the best way of making the roads safer.
That's not slightly controversial, that's just wrong.
Ask anyone and s/he will consider themselves exactly such "good enough" drivers.
The thing is that there are certain standards of objectivity with regards to reaction speed in various circumstances...and these change, depending on your state of mood, how much sleep you got, how much you had to eat and at what time, what music you're playing et cetera et cetera!
That's why you need a COMPULSORY minimal distance and a maximum speed to ensure a minimal risk.
And, as Alan very rightly stated, the fact that everyone ELSE on the road is required to abide by that as well helps creating optimal safety circumstances.
Leave it up to your individual motorist, and you'll have as many "safe conditions" as there are cars on the road...'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn -
- CommentAuthorsdtom
- CommentTimeMay 27th 2009
But break the law and you should suffer as opposed to a slap on the wrist.listen to more classical music! -
- CommentAuthorMartijn
- CommentTimeMay 27th 2009
Oooooo, Tom! At times you have quite the medieval streak!'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn -
- CommentAuthorSouthall
- CommentTimeMay 27th 2009
Martijn wrote
Southall wrote
A slightly controversial opinion, perhaps, but still - if people were good enough drivers then we wouldn't need speed limits at all - people could just judge the conditions for themselves and make their own mind up. As I said before, the driving test should be considerably harder. If it meant only 5% of people passed it, then so be it. It's by far the best way of making the roads safer.
That's not slightly controversial, that's just wrong.
Ask anyone and s/he will consider themselves exactly such "good enough" drivers.
The thing is that there are certain standards of objectivity with regards to reaction speed in various circumstances...and these change, depending on your state of mood, how much sleep you got, how much you had to eat and at what time, what music you're playing et cetera et cetera!
That's why you need a COMPULSORY minimal distance and a maximum speed to ensure a minimal risk.
And, as Alan very rightly stated, the fact that everyone ELSE on the road is required to abide by that as well helps creating optimal safety circumstances.
Leave it up to your individual motorist, and you'll have as many "safe conditions" as there are cars on the road...
...which is why you should only allow sensible people to drive. -
- CommentAuthorMartijn
- CommentTimeMay 27th 2009
What a magnificent idea.'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn -
- CommentAuthorSouthall
- CommentTimeMay 27th 2009
Martijn wrote
What a magnificent idea.
Yeah, that's the dream.
To go off topic for a moment, I remember reading once that North Korea had built the world's most expensive road (through some mountains) and there was an interesting article in a magazine about it. Then right at the end of the article, it mentioned in passing that cars are banned in North Korea except for top government officials. -
- CommentAuthorMartijn
- CommentTimeMay 27th 2009
Please move your post to the North Korea thread.'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn -
- CommentAuthorSouthall
- CommentTimeMay 27th 2009
Frankly I think it's about time we had a North Korea section to the board, not just one thread. -
- CommentAuthorsdtom
- CommentTimeMay 29th 2009
ONE SMART MOUSE!!!!
He manages to eat the peanut butter, set off the trap, and get away. Yikes
Thomaslisten to more classical music! -
- CommentAuthorTimmer
- CommentTimeMay 29th 2009
Get a cat Tom, much smarter than mousetraps
On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt -
- CommentAuthorsdtom
- CommentTimeMay 29th 2009
I did but I don't anymore. Would like to have her back but its a long story.listen to more classical music!
