• Categories

Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

 
    •  
      CommentAuthorMartijn
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2013
    But...
    But...
    But...
    'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn
    •  
      CommentAuthorMartijn
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2013
    Things were just getting interesting. sad
    'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn
  1. Martijn wrote
    franz_conrad wrote
    I don't hear the detail if I don't like the thing that's detailed. That's the fallacy.


    But that's a meta-fallacy.
    Of course you could hear the detail if (1) you were so inclined and (2) if it were there.


    I might have to bow to you on the correct use of the term. I would have thought it a fallacy if I didn't believe the detail was there. A bit like someone describing a foreign language as gobbledygook because there aren't enough recognisable triggers to make meaning out of it. (But wait, I'm meant to be gone. Just replying as Martijn put up his thought before my last post popped up.)
    A butterfly thinks therefore I am
    •  
      CommentAuthorScribe
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2013
    franz_conrad wrote
    Bye for now all -- I should have thought twice before posting in a thread that's gained 40 posts since I saw it last. Ciao.


    I really appreciated your comments smile

    I think I am getting inspired to create a heavily shortened, completely re-arranged playlist of Smaug, maybe about 45 minutes in length, for anyone who can't get into the full version but is willing to use their media software to create for themselves a more intelligently designed and listening-friendly album.
    I love you all. Never change. Well, unless you want to!
    •  
      CommentAuthorMartijn
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2013 edited
    [brief response to Franz] At the risk of talking to myself (you being gone and all wink ), I wasn't so much interested in correct phrasing as I was in the juxtaposition of emotion and cognition. To me the argument you made was one very much based on emotion , i.e. "I don't like it, so I don't bother".
    Not on reason "I don't like it, therefore I can't hear it".

    (I'm oversimplifying, of course, for clarity's sake. Forgive me for that little leeway)

    That's what makes this discussion overwhelmingly interesting to me (in massive contrast to, say the Zimmer Wars some time back), because I'm trying to figure out the balance between interest (i.e. overall impression), gut feeling (i.e. love, hate, indifference) and academic "measurable" value (i.e. 'number' of themes, level of detail).

    Honestly, I find this whole thread fascinating.
    'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn
    •  
      CommentAuthorStavroula
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2013 edited
    Why oh why do most of you complicate something that is meant to give joy? The act of listening to music! Don't get me wrong! It's very interesting to read all your comments and analyses and in former days I would have contributed enthousiastically advocating for or against the complexity or not of Shore's score. But insisting on some points that much it is actually boring for me. And I will agree with Franz on that. A thread's posts increasing rapidly means trouble most of the times. Arguing is healthy and by all means continue but do we have to stick to a specific point for so long?
    Whatever you gaze rests on,do not use your vision, but the eyes of your soul...She knows better...
    •  
      CommentAuthorMartijn
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2013
    Hmmmm, maybe it's simply that I don't have any kind of strong relation to either the films or the scores that I find it all rather interesting (not the details per se, but how people come to those details, or their motivations to see them, seek them out or, contrarily, refute them).

    I do seem to be in the minority though. sad
    'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn
    •  
      CommentAuthorStavroula
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2013 edited
    It was not an answer to you Martijn! It was a comment on the whole thread. So I must perhpaps edit it to make it obvious.
    Whatever you gaze rests on,do not use your vision, but the eyes of your soul...She knows better...
    •  
      CommentAuthorMartijn
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2013
    Not to worry! I got that! smile

    It's just that (also through your post) I just noticed that quite a few people actually expressed some annoyance (or boredom) at one point or another in the thread! So I realised I probably should stop trying to prod for more discussion at this point. Even if it's interesting to me!

    Still haven't seen the film anyway, so I should probably revisit when I have. wink
    'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn
  2. It kinda saddens me that a good spirited discussion like this would bore or annoy people; certainly nobody is forcing anybody to join in, and we shouldn't stomp all over people who want to get into the grittier details of a discussion either.
    •  
      CommentAuthorStavroula
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2013
    What annoys me is not the discussion around the score. That's why we are here for. It's the intensity with which we, and I include myself too, stick to our opinion and get annoyed when others stick to theirs. Human nature I guess. I'll watch the film too soon, so when you do too we can exchange comments on it. Pity there is not going to be coffee this time! smile
    Whatever you gaze rests on,do not use your vision, but the eyes of your soul...She knows better...
    •  
      CommentAuthorErik Woods
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2013 edited
    Stavroula wrote
    Arguing is healthy and by all means continue but do we have to stick to a specific point for so long?


    I thought it was a healthy discussion? confused I actually enjoyed my interaction with Matt and Edmund. All this Hobbit talk actually has me interested in revisiting the first film and score again (two things I haven't gone back to in about a year) and to pay a bit more attention to Shore's latest offering. BTW, Matt's 45 minute playlist offering of Smaug would be most welcome.

    Oh well... slant

    -Erik-
    host and executive producer of THE CINEMATIC SOUND RADIO PODCAST | www.cinematicsound.net | www.facebook.com/cinematicsound | I HAVE TINNITUS!
    •  
      CommentAuthorMartijn
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2013
    Erik Woods wrote
    BTW, Matt's 45 minute playlist offering of Smaug would be most welcome.


    Seconded!
    'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn
    •  
      CommentAuthorStavroula
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2013
    Edmund Meinerts wrote
    It kinda saddens me that a good spirited discussion like this would bore or annoy people; certainly nobody is forcing anybody to join in, and we shouldn't stomp all over people who want to get into the grittier details of a discussion either.


    Dear Edmund stomping over people is not my style. I'm too light anyway and Martijn who saw me recently can atest to that. Moreover, you can search my older posts and see that many times I discuss details too. Anyway, surely no one is stopping you. And by the way "good spirited discussions" many times have stopped being good spirited in the past and this is something not very nice.
    Whatever you gaze rests on,do not use your vision, but the eyes of your soul...She knows better...
    •  
      CommentAuthorMartijn
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2013
    Stavroula wrote
    Pity there is not going to be coffee this time! smile


    Well, where is it playing in Athens?
    I'll drop by! We can have coffee after! And champagne!



    ...
    I'm kidding! I'm kidding!
    (Coffee and champagne is a HORRIBLE combination)
    'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn
    •  
      CommentAuthorStavroula
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2013
    Erik Woods wrote
    Stavroula wrote
    Arguing is healthy and by all means continue but do we have to stick to a specific point for so long?


    I thought it was a healthy discussion? confused I actually enjoyed my interaction with Matt and Edmund. All this Hobbit talk actually has me interested in revisiting the first film and score again (two things I haven't gone back to in about a year) and to pay a bit more attention to Shore's latest offering. BTW, Matt's 45 minute playlist offering of Smaug would be most welcome.

    Oh well... slant

    -Erik-



    Ok, ok if I got it wrong ignore me! I don't participate much anyway! I prefer reading your posts!
    Whatever you gaze rests on,do not use your vision, but the eyes of your soul...She knows better...
    •  
      CommentAuthorStavroula
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2013 edited
    By the way since when my comments have stopped any of you from discussing anything? confused
    I may be one of the few females here but I'm no mother of the den so I don't get your reactions. It was just my opinion! (See what I mean wink )
    Anyway. I have to get up at 6:30 tomorrow and I also feel it's time for one of my breaks.
    Good night guys! smile kiss
    Whatever you gaze rests on,do not use your vision, but the eyes of your soul...She knows better...
    •  
      CommentAuthorScribe
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2013
    The 45 minute playlist will probably come in about a week, once I have finished my standard 4 listens...surprisingly, I do actually spend time on other things besides overanalyzing the latest film scores...though most of the other things aren't quite as fun wink
    I love you all. Never change. Well, unless you want to!
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2013
    Yes ma'am.
    •  
      CommentAuthorScribe
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2013
    Martijn wrote
    That's what makes this discussion overwhelmingly interesting to me (in massive contrast to, say the Zimmer Wars some time back), because I'm trying to figure out the balance between interest (i.e. overall impression), gut feeling (i.e. love, hate, indifference) and academic "measurable" value (i.e. 'number' of themes, level of detail).


    You might be interested to notice that I haven't actually expressed any particular love for the actual music in Smaug. Outside of a few isolated tracks, I'm not actually enjoying it that much. I suspect that's mainly because the film is rather dark and foreboding and, unfortunately, a bit plodding. Not much room for the kind of emotions I usually most enjoy in film music. But my inner Asperger's super-nerd is absolutely delighted with the complexity and thoughtfulness that I'm discovering in the construction of the score. Shore obviously feels exactly the same way about leitmotif that I do. Its like revisting a soulmate after a year of hanging out with extremely likeable but somehow emotionally disconnected people. There have been many beautiful scores in 2013 but outside of Man of Steel, none that I feel such an intimate connection with the composer's artistic decisions, in the sense that it makes me think, "yes, that's exactly the music you should have written!" So, at this point, my love for the score is 75% intellectual. Which to me is a completely valid type of attraction, but to others might seem utterly silly, to enjoy music for something other than its ability to make you feel positive emotions.
    I love you all. Never change. Well, unless you want to!
    •  
      CommentAuthorMartijn
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2013 edited
    Uhhhh....Wow! That came out of left field!

    Well.
    Not really.
    But it's certainly a take that is well outside of my comfort zone.

    I need to digest this. Will revisit tomorrow!
    'no passion nor excitement here, despite all the notes and musicians' ~ Falkirkbairn
  3. Interesting post there Matt. I can relate to an extent, although the intellectual element (such as it is, and Shore still feels a bit 'left-hand-right-hand' to me) isn't giving me nearly so much to power off with this score.
    A butterfly thinks therefore I am
  4. Demetris wrote
    Bollocks, out of all that discussion this is what you extracted? My comment, which was in the lighter spirit i tried to infuse (but failed obviously) among the deadly boring (to me) discussion, doesn't suggest that I have problems with anyone. I generally find Erik more laid back than the past, and i agree with him more frequent now, that's why i said what i said, but it doesn't have anything to do with Matt or anyone else.


    Peace, son of Agamemnon. A gentle dig it was, and all it was. wink
    A butterfly thinks therefore I am
    •  
      CommentAuthorsdtom
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2013
    This has been really a lot of activity. Nice to see.
    Tom
    listen to more classical music!
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2013
    Martijn wrote
    Erik Woods wrote
    BTW, Matt's 45 minute playlist offering of Smaug would be most welcome.


    Seconded!


    Yeah i thought about that too; maybe it will help us look at the score from his point of view.
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
    •  
      CommentAuthorBregt
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2013 edited
    In Belgium big blockbuster movies always premiere a few days before the American release because it has been proven we are a very reliable people when it comes to movies. So my opinion will be a meta-fact, which is in fact a fact but with the meta prefix added for euphemistic reasons.

    So yesterday I saw the movie . While the world of Tolkien is very undemocratic, there was a first mention of the word "election". I thought that moment was funny. Besides that, the movie is sometimes fun and sometimes boring. The difference between the LOTR films and the Hobbit films are that I just don't care what happens in the latter. Story goes, things happen, orcs come and go, elfs jump in, ... There's no glorious moments like the siege of Helm's Deep, the climb of Gandalf to the White Tree, the heroic moments of Aragorn, ... The story is not very interesting either. But it's very well done and often a joy to watch. I probably won't see it again unless perhaps it's on tv or when I want to see dwarfs in barrels.

    However, I appreciate the music a little more now. I had heard the score one time before and I couldn't make a clue out of it. It's much clearer now what the big main themes are, and the one for the Kate-elf is the best one. Beautiful theme. But, similarly to my view on the movies, the music is also less recognizable and a bit lost in all the dark forests of Middle-Earth.
    Kazoo
    •  
      CommentAuthorBregt
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2013
    Also, I hope franz only left this thread? confused
    Kazoo
    •  
      CommentAuthorThor
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2013
    Smaug.
    I am extremely serious.
    •  
      CommentAuthorBregt
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2013 edited
    Thor wrote
    The Lake Town is my favourite city in the whole of Middle-Earth because it is so Norwegian. I only missed the snow and fjords. Otherwise I'd move there right away.

    Yes, I agree.
    Kazoo
    •  
      CommentAuthorThor
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2013
    Bregt wrote
    Thor wrote
    The Lake Town is my favourite city in the whole of Middle-Earth because it is so Norwegian. I only missed the snow and fjords. Otherwise I'd move there right away.

    Yes, I agree.


    Hey, I never said that. I see what you did there!
    I am extremely serious.