Categories
Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
[Closed] Now Playing XXXIII
-
- CommentAuthorSouthall
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
Pawel, thanks for your long post. I realise that some people won't have time to read it all so I have taken the liberty of extracting the most important part (and perhaps the only part which is fact, not opinion):
PawelStroinski wrote
Ridley Scott knows shit about music. -
- CommentAuthorAtham
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
Aaahh, the Avatar controversy continues! I can certainly see everyone's point of view on this score.
But darn it, I really like it. Very entertaining on all levels.
NP: Innerspace - Jerry Goldsmith
There is so much fun contained in this score. Great to have it all finally released. It's been a long wait!
I especially love the ST: The Motion Picture sounding moments. -
- CommentAuthorTimmer
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
Southall wrote
Pawel, thanks for your long post. I realise that some people won't have time to read it all so I have taken the liberty of extracting the most important part (and perhaps the only part which is fact, not opinion):
PawelStroinski wrote
Ridley Scott knows shit about music.
And that, I wholeheartedly agree with!
On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt -
- CommentAuthorNautilus
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009 edited
PawelStroinski wrote
James Horner - Avatar
Avatar needed a creational score. The whole movie is about creating a new world, visually not like any world before. Horner doesn't have that creational instinct like Zimmer or Vangelis does, so, I think, at a certain point, his abilities went to a halt. He knew that he would have to restrain his orchestrational technique and aim for something more, hmm, arrangement-wise versatile. It's not another Willow (Willow doesn't transfer into another world, but it's hell of a good score), but it's not Alien or Blade Runner either. He had to find a reference point. Along came a Zimmer. I think this is why this score is so Zimmerish, even in the relation between orchestra and synthesizers. That's my theory.
Agree in everything you said.
The main reasons because Horner couldn't create a soundscapes for this movie is:
a) his obsession to remain so close to his sound, themes and instrumentations
b) Horner is not a good synth composer. Horner is not good mixing tribal sounds with orchestra. How you said, it's the king in the old school way of composition.
NP:Avatar (Horner)
1 day for the movie!
The first 5 tracks almost are succesful creating the mood. and the last 2 are real killers.
The main theme (not the four feather's one...) really captures the sense of wondourness. -
- CommentAuthorSouthall
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
I will offer a more serious response to Pawel's thought-provoking post when I get home tonight.
I did have two initial thoughts--
(i) It's hard not to remember the story about Miklos Rozsa spending a similar (12-18 month) time working on Ben-Hur, touring academic institutions of Europe to find out as much as he could about Roman music, and ending up writing a score which sounds like his others. (And also, that the score he wrote is almost universally considered one of the all-time-greats.)
(ii) I wholeheartedly disagree that Horner is of the "old school". His approach to film music - for better or worse - has always been about only one thing, which is deciding what emotion any particular scene is meant to bring out in the audience and then trying his hardest to manipulate that emotion from the audience. That's not "old school". -
- CommentAuthorNautilus
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
Southall wrote
trying his hardest to manipulate ".
I couldn't agree more , James.
-
- CommentAuthorPawelStroinski
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
Southall wrote
I will offer a more serious response to Pawel's thought-provoking post when I get home tonight.
I did have two initial thoughts--
(i) It's hard not to remember the story about Miklos Rozsa spending a similar (12-18 month) time working on Ben-Hur, touring academic institutions of Europe to find out as much as he could about Roman music, and ending up writing a score which sounds like his others. (And also, that the score he wrote is almost universally considered one of the all-time-greats.)
(ii) I wholeheartedly disagree that Horner is of the "old school". His approach to film music - for better or worse - has always been about only one thing, which is deciding what emotion any particular scene is meant to bring out in the audience and then trying his hardest to manipulate that emotion from the audience. That's not "old school".
Horner is old-school in his approach to orchestra, not to movies. He is symphonic (not electronic, rockman-like). Symphony orchestra is the first thing always. Of course he DID do scores like, say , The Life Before Her Eyes, though his electronic (purely electronic) scores always sound more like The Forgotten than Life Before Her Eyes. He is a dramatic composer above all.
Rozsa, of course. But remember that Rozsa lived in different times. When Bernard Herrmann panicked that his scoring schedule was shortened from 12 to 8 weeks he panicked, Horner or Zimmer, or even Goldsmith for that matter had to bring in a two hour score in 2 weeks. Also musicological research except notable exceptions, like Horner on Four Feathers (you have to know Qawwali music to write it like Four Feathers) or Zimmer on Last Samurai is "out of fashion" right now. Even Horner is hated by Scotsmen for using Irish bag pipes on Braveheart (I know that from a few Scotsmen). Ben Hur of course IS one of the greats, even if I am not really much into Rozsa (I much prefer Al Newman or Bernie Herrmann, Rozsa is a bit too fanfare-y for my tastes).
Zimmer encourages to see the first twentysomething minutes of Gladiator as a prelude of sorts. Compare it to Rozsa's overture material. Without passing judgement what is better and not musically, try to notice the difference of what the music tries to say. Rozsa's triumphant fanfare as opposed to what exactly? As I say, don't review the music, just compare the approach.http://www.filmmusic.pl - Polish Film Music Review Website -
- CommentAuthorkeky
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
La Piovra Disc 2 - Ennio Morricone
Much better than the first disc. The track "Requiem" is a masterpiece. Majestic choral work with a real emotional charge. Wonderful! -
- CommentAuthorSouthall
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
Nautilus wrote
Southall wrote
trying his hardest to manipulate ".
I couldn't agree more , James.
And that's one reason people don't like him (see the quotes from House of Sand & Fog director at the FSM post for instance). -
- CommentAuthorPawelStroinski
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
I remember a story Perelman told in an interview when he went to Horner's house (who wanted to do that movie) and went through his CDs: Titanic, crap, Perfect Storm, crap... (SAYING that in Horner's house
)http://www.filmmusic.pl - Polish Film Music Review Website -
- CommentAuthorSouthall
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
PawelStroinski wrote
Horner is old-school in his approach to orchestra, not to movies. He is symphonic (not electronic, rockman-like). Symphony orchestra is the first thing always. Of course he DID do scores like, say , The Life Before Her Eyes, though his electronic (purely electronic) scores always sound more like The Forgotten than Life Before Her Eyes. He is a dramatic composer above all.
I mostly agree with that but am not sure what point you're making with it in relation to Avatar. Do you think a primarily orchestral approach is wrong? -
- CommentAuthorSouthall
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
PawelStroinski wrote
I remember a story Perelman told in an interview when he went to Horner's house (who wanted to do that movie) and went through his CDs: Titanic, crap, Perfect Storm, crap... (SAYING that in Horner's house
)
Yeah, that's the one quoted at FSM. It completely blows apart the theory that Horner is unprofessional and lets his ego get in the way too much, in fact. Essentially Perelman is saying Horner was forced on him by the studio, he hated Horner's music and approach to film scoring, and yet he found that Horner was able to deliver exactly the score he wanted. (While House of Sand & Fog is obviously different in sound from what Horner was generally doing at the time, it's still built on the same foundations - not in terms of instrumentation, but in terms of dramatic instinct.) Indeed he was so impressed that Horner also scored his next film. -
- CommentAuthorPawelStroinski
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
Southall wrote
PawelStroinski wrote
Horner is old-school in his approach to orchestra, not to movies. He is symphonic (not electronic, rockman-like). Symphony orchestra is the first thing always. Of course he DID do scores like, say , The Life Before Her Eyes, though his electronic (purely electronic) scores always sound more like The Forgotten than Life Before Her Eyes. He is a dramatic composer above all.
I mostly agree with that but am not sure what point you're making with it in relation to Avatar. Do you think a primarily orchestral approach is wrong?
Arrangement-wise? Not really. But if your primary concern is symphonic development, you don't think of the general atmosphere you need to achieve. You think of the intricacies of voice leading, cool instrumentation. This is why I think for such a project, Zimmer's "band" approach is the one to take, because you think of the sound in general - orchestra is a part of a bigger ensemble, rather than soloist being parts of the orchestra. I think, where Horner fails often in context of the movie (as opposed to other great orchestrators, like Williams for example) is that he sometimes rather concentrates on getting a neat orchestration than fitting the movie emotionally and his technical approach to string writing makes him so saccharine.
House of Sand and Fog (an underrated score to me) is a prime example of him leaving his tricks aside and working on THE MOVIE. Though, the score DOES get overly dramatic in the end of the movie. I believe Perelman, though, that it was his fault not Horner's. That was a nice thing to admit.http://www.filmmusic.pl - Polish Film Music Review Website -
- CommentAuthorNautilus
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009 edited
NP:Sherlock Holmes (zimmer)
the 18 minutes track contains some of the most powerful orchestral ourbusts of the year!!!
A mix of Black Hawk Down, Matchstick men, Jack Sparrow and and everlasting piece!!! -
- CommentAuthorfranz_conrad
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
Southall wrote
(ii) I wholeheartedly disagree that Horner is of the "old school". His approach to film music - for better or worse - has always been about only one thing, which is deciding what emotion any particular scene is meant to bring out in the audience and then trying his hardest to manipulate that emotion from the audience. That's not "old school".
Really? Max Steiner would have loved that description on his gravestone!A butterfly thinks therefore I am -
- CommentAuthorPawelStroinski
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
Exactly. That sounds rather Golden Age.http://www.filmmusic.pl - Polish Film Music Review Website -
- CommentAuthorkeky
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
Sherlock Holmes - Hans Zimmer
I don't want to listen to the entire score, I leave that to when I'll have the CD in my hands. But the tracks I listened to are quite good. It's refreshing to hear this side of Zimmer. Sounds so much better than Angels and Demons. I especially love his use of the violin. Played like Sherlock Holmes could have played it... -
- CommentAuthorNautilus
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009 edited
Nautilus wrote
NP:Sherlock Holmes (zimmer)
the 18 minutes track contains some of the most powerful orchestral ourbusts of the year!!!
A mix of Black Hawk Down, Matchstick men, Jack Sparrow and and everlasting piece!!!
OH GOD!
It has much more authentic period instrumentation than I thought. Even with the electronic percusion and distorsion effects, there are A LOT of orchestral and ethnic instrumentations wich makes this score much more MATURE than you could think.
Shelock Holmes = Frost/nixon + Matchstick men+ Jack Sparrow+ Black Hawk Down+ Everlasting piece+ broken arrow+Jones From Hell+ Cartel Burwell ok...and MORRICONE.
the 18 minutes track is a fantastic Cat and Mouse track with tremendous orchestral moments.
Fantastic score Maestro Zimmer! and the movie is having good reviews! -
- CommentAuthorDemetris
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders. -
- CommentAuthorSteven
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
-
- CommentAuthorDemetris
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
Who is Jones From Hell?Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders. -
- CommentAuthorDemetris
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
GABRIEL YARED - amelia
Gorgeously elegant, lush and melodic, evokes Barry at several points. Easily one of the highlights of the year.Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders. -
- CommentAuthorDemonStar
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
NP: Anastasia (Complete) - David Newman
Talk about being underrated. What a magnificent score! -
- CommentAuthorTimmer
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
Christodoulides wrote
Who is Jones From Hell?
A Welshman who breathes fire out of his arse?On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt -
- CommentAuthorNautilus
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
Christodoulides wrote
Who is Jones From Hell?
Trevor Jones, From Hell. -
- CommentAuthorTimmer
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
There's a Trevor Jones from Hell....in Norway?On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt -
- CommentAuthorMarselus
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
Nautilus wrote
Shelock Holmes = Frost/nixon + Matchstick men+ Jack Sparrow+ Black Hawk Down+ Everlasting piece+ broken arrow+Jones From Hell+ Cartel Burwell ok...and MORRICONE.
Insane!Anything with an orchestra or with a choir....at some point will reach you -
- CommentAuthorSouthall
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
franz_conrad wrote
Southall wrote
(ii) I wholeheartedly disagree that Horner is of the "old school". His approach to film music - for better or worse - has always been about only one thing, which is deciding what emotion any particular scene is meant to bring out in the audience and then trying his hardest to manipulate that emotion from the audience. That's not "old school".
Really? Max Steiner would have loved that description on his gravestone!
He might, but I have a hard time accepting that it's what he did. I'd say he offered musical commentary on a film, like probably all film composers up to (approx) Herrmann and North, a tradition revived by Star Wars later on. I don't think emotion particularly comes into it at all. -
- CommentAuthorlp
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
Nautilus wrote
Nautilus wrote
NP:Sherlock Holmes (zimmer)
the 18 minutes track contains some of the most powerful orchestral ourbusts of the year!!!
A mix of Black Hawk Down, Matchstick men, Jack Sparrow and and everlasting piece!!!
OH GOD!
It has much more authentic period instrumentation than I thought. Even with the electronic percusion and distorsion effects, there are A LOT of orchestral and ethnic instrumentations wich makes this score much more MATURE than you could think.
Shelock Holmes = Frost/nixon + Matchstick men+ Jack Sparrow+ Black Hawk Down+ Everlasting piece+ broken arrow+Jones From Hell+ Cartel Burwell ok...and MORRICONE.
the 18 minutes track is a fantastic Cat and Mouse track with tremendous orchestral moments.
Fantastic score Maestro Zimmer! and the movie is having good reviews!
So it's like a Hans Zimmer score....
Quite enjoyable. -
- CommentAuthorfranz_conrad
- CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
Southall wrote
franz_conrad wrote
Southall wrote
(ii) I wholeheartedly disagree that Horner is of the "old school". His approach to film music - for better or worse - has always been about only one thing, which is deciding what emotion any particular scene is meant to bring out in the audience and then trying his hardest to manipulate that emotion from the audience. That's not "old school".
Really? Max Steiner would have loved that description on his gravestone!
He might, but I have a hard time accepting that it's what he did. I'd say he offered musical commentary on a film, like probably all film composers up to (approx) Herrmann and North, a tradition revived by Star Wars later on. I don't think emotion particularly comes into it at all.
I must admit my eye fell more on the 'manipulate the hell out of the audience' bit.
Still, I think a lot of the work by the early masters was based on a recognition that there was a difference between how the scene was meant to be coming across, and how it did come across. The sense that it's all musical commentary now (which it isn't in something like Waxman's REBECCA) is partly because the degree of musical involvement has drifted to become less visible in the time since.A butterfly thinks therefore I am
