register

  • Categories

Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

 

MICHAEL GIACCHINO

General Discussions » MICHAEL GIACCHINO (Posts 2401 to 2430 of 4690)

  1. <
  2. 1
  3. ...
  4. 77
  5. 78
  6. 79
  7. 80
  8. 81
  9. 82
  10. 83
  11. 84
  12. ...
  13. 157
  14. >
  1. William wrote
    So, there is a rumored Star Trek sequel planned for a 2011 release. And if J.J. Abrams is onboard, then Giacchino doubtlessly is, also. I know there are a lot of people here and out there who can't stomach Giacchino's Star Trek, say it's not like the old Star Trek scores, etc., but the fact is that this man is going to rewrite the history of Star Trek music and throw his name in the mix. Ten or twenty years from now, after a series of younger generation Star Trek movies, Giacchino will be as large a part of the franchise's music as Goldsmith. Horner's Star Trek was vastly different from Goldsmith's, but it has come to be accepted as 'Star Trek music;' why should Giacchino's music be any other way?

    There have already been several different composers and scoring styles associated with the franchise, and they have all been accepted as Star Trek music. So why is it a problem to call Giacchino's music the same? Is it the fact that William Shatner, Leonard Nimoy, and DeForest Kelley are not commandeering the bridge of the Enterprise? The fact that neither are Patrick Stewart, Jonathan Frakes, and Michael Dorn? I don't know, but I sense an apprehension and resent towards change... And I feel it just as much in criticism of the music as of the new cast. Just my take.


    they already said there would be a sequel, even before the first one was released
    so Giacchino will be onboard
    waaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! Where's my nut? arrrghhhhhhh
    •  
      CommentAuthorWilliam
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009 edited
    Thomas Glorieux wrote
    they already said there would be a sequel, even before the first one was released
    so Giacchino will be onboard


    Sweet! cheesy
  3. William wrote
    Horner's Star Trek was vastly different from Goldsmith's, but it has come to be accepted as 'Star Trek music;' why should Giacchino's music be any other way?


    By that argument, someone could write an utterly crap score for a new STAR TREK film and feel pretty confident that it would be embraced as a classic in time. wink
    A butterfly thinks therefore I am
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009 edited
    William, and others, stop with the annoying quotes, seriously. I'll start editing posts with unnecessary quoting; the post you quoted is RIGHT ABOVE YOURS, no need to quote. We need to tidy up the place a bit.
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009 edited
    franz_conrad wrote

    By that argument, someone could write an utterly crap score for a new STAR TREK film and feel pretty confident that it would be embraced as a classic in time. wink


    Tyler Bates.
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
    •  
      CommentAuthorWilliam
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009
    Christodoulides wrote
    William, and others, stop with the annoying quotes, seriously. I'll start editing posts with unnecessary quoting; the post you quoted is RIGHT ABOVE YOURS, no need to quote. We need to tidy up the place a bit.


    I'm sorry... Really. shame slant
    •  
      CommentAuthorWilliam
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009
    franz_conrad wrote
    William wrote
    Horner's Star Trek was vastly different from Goldsmith's, but it has come to be accepted as 'Star Trek music;' why should Giacchino's music be any other way?


    By that argument, someone could write an utterly crap score for a new STAR TREK film and feel pretty confident that it would be embraced as a classic in time. wink


    Well... dizzy wink It depends. I'd venture to say Giacchino's Star Trek is not crap. It's just different.
  8. Yeah, Giacchino's Star Trek is NOT crap.
    http://www.filmmusic.pl - Polish Film Music Review Website
    •  
      CommentAuthorWilliam
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009
    PawelStroinski wrote
    Yeah, Giacchino's Star Trek is NOT crap.


    beer
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009
    Did anyone say it was?
    • CommentAuthorAnthony
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009
    William, please can you stop quoting people if you're reply is right underneath or the discussion hasn't changed. It's incredibly frustrating now and you're even doing it when you simply reply with emoticons - or, taking it too far - to just say you're sorry for the previous quote.
    •  
      CommentAuthorWilliam
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009 edited
    Um... OK... Sorry... I don't think about it much; it just kinda happens. sad I'm sorry... Ugh. slant I'll pay more attention and stop doing that. I'm sorry. I don't mean to annoy anyone here... sad
    •  
      CommentAuthorWilliam
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009
    Steven wrote
    Did anyone say it was?


    No...
    • CommentAuthorTimmer
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009
    It's never bothered or annoyed me. *shrug*
    On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt
    • CommentAuthorAnthony
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009
    •  
      CommentAuthorWilliam
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009 edited
    confused And in response to Timmer, well, apparently it's seriously bothered some people. And I'm sorry for that.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009
    Timmer wrote
    It's never bothered or annoyed me. *shrug*


    That's because you've never asked someone repeatedly not to do it to only be completely ignored either intentionally or through shear absent mindedness. Or both.

    But whatever. I give up. I just come here for the women and mojitos...
    • CommentAuthorTimmer
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009
    'Women and mojitos'?!

    WHERE??? uhm lick
    On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009
    Firmly lodged in my mind, that's where.
    •  
      CommentAuthorWilliam
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009 edited
    Steven wrote
    That's because you've never asked someone repeatedly not to do it to only be completely ignored either intentionally or through shear absent mindedness. Or both.


    Steven, I never understood till today what you or anyone else were talking about regarding me and quoting. And I'm being 100% honest. I always thought you were trying to get at either me or Tom when you mentioned quoting, but I never fully understood what I was doing wrong... Thanks. slant
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009 edited
    It doesn't take a genius to work out that if someone is directly asking you (on several occasions I might add) not to quote already 'overly-quoted' replies -especially if your reply is simply 'lol' for example- then you should probably take note and heed the warning (not to mention the 'Quoting for Dummies' thread which you even posted in and assumedly read!!).

    Regardless, I'm not angry. It's just a forum, and at the end of the day life goes on... unless you're dead of course.
    I'm just a little bewildered as to how you didn't understand it in the first place? dizzy
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009
    Btw, the last thing I want is for a horribly regimented and strict Rule of Quoting to begin. Far from it! Just use quoting sensibly, that's all I ask. smile
    •  
      CommentAuthorWilliam
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009
    Sorry... slant suicide
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009
    William wrote
    Sorry... slant suicide


    ^This^ type of quoting directly beneath the original post is fine. Just don't go over board.
    •  
      CommentAuthorScribe
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009
    I came here expecting a discussion about Giacchino and... shocked
    I love you all. Never change. Well, unless you want to!
    • CommentAuthorTimmer
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009
    A composer thread with over 80 pages is bound to go OT here and there.
    On Friday I ate a lot of dust and appeared orange near the end of the day ~ Bregt
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009
    Yeah, but let's stop it here, i don't think it'd be a bad idea to delete those posts either....
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009
    Christodoulides wrote
    i don't think it'd be a bad idea to delete those posts either....


    Why? confused
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009
    Cause when one logs into the Giacchino thread, the last thing they will want to read is William being sorry and people trying to explain to him in so much detail a matter as simple as that; anyway, i am not adding more to this.
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2009
    But you're describing exactly the thing I want to avoid: Regimented and strict rules.

    I mean, say we were discussing about Michael Giacchino face-to-face and someone decided to talk about something else, we're not gonna scrub people's memories that anything off-topic was said would we? You seem to have an itchy trigger finger when it comes to deleting posts!

2401 to 2430 of 4690

  1. <
  2. 1
  3. ...
  4. 77
  5. 78
  6. 79
  7. 80
  8. 81
  9. 82
  10. 83
  11. 84
  12. ...
  13. 157
  14. >