• Categories

Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

 
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeDec 23rd 2008
    Shame Jordi will ignore anything said in an interesting and fair discussion. He'll continue to believe the whole world is against Zimmer. wink
    • CommentAuthormarkrayen
    • CommentTimeDec 23rd 2008
    PawelStroinski wrote

    First, art and technique, Goldenthal and Zimmer are examples of futility of this "eternal discussion".

    Second. Goldenthal is a much more complex composer than Zimmer would ever be, EVEN if, thanks to Black Hawk Down, Zimmer opened up to some avant-garde technique, perhaps even aleatorism (Demetris?). It is very complicated to write SENSIBLE and STRUCTURED dissonant/atonal music, where the opposition we have is Goldenthal, Davis or even Herrmann to Graeme Revell or early Zimmer (Black Rain anyone?). It is VERY hard for such music to actually have emotional and structural meaning. Of course, great themes are also important, but Goldenthal shown his capability in that area too.


    Graeme Revell is an excellent comparison. His music is intentionally simple (often brilliant), and the art of simplicity is often underestimated in film music. It takes an extremely intelligent composer to produce the kind of results he has accomplished. From that point of view I believe Steven's point about Goldenthal being more intelligent is invalid. I don't think the fact that he (Goldenthal) has developed a taste for complex lyricism and exotic, uncontrolled dissonance ranks him more intelligent than anyone who has developed a taste for melodic simplicity, and aims at creating results that are easy to digest by the audience they were created for. These conflicting compositional intentions could require an equal amount of brains to master. I also disagree with the suggestion that it is hard for atonal/dissonant music to have emotional (or structural) meaning. This kind of music can be very liberating and increases a composer's tools for among other things buiding, meeting, and ( more importantly) breaking expectations.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeDec 23rd 2008 edited
    So you don't think Goldenthal is a more intelligent composer than Zimmer? confused
    • CommentAuthormarkrayen
    • CommentTimeDec 23rd 2008
    I used to hate Zimmer... untill I tried to imitate him. Then I realized it takes a lot of smarts to write the kind of cheesy action scores only he knows how! The answer though is yes, I think Goldenthal has a superior craftmanship and overall knowledge of orchestral music. I just don't agree with the rhetoric present in yours and Demetris' posts. Its more an opinion than an observation you've presented smile
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeDec 23rd 2008
    Goldenthal uncontrolled dissonance? confused shocked
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeDec 23rd 2008 edited
    markrayen wrote
    I used to hate Zimmer... untill I tried to imitate him. Then I realized it takes a lot of smarts to write the kind of cheesy action scores only he knows how! The answer though is yes, I think Goldenthal has a superior craftmanship and overall knowledge of orchestral music. I just don't agree with the rhetoric present in yours and Demetris' posts. Its more an opinion than an observation you've presented smile


    I'm afraid I disagree with that. I think there is a point to which you can call one composer more intelligent than the other. Hell, I may be wrong... but that's what I'll believe for now. wink
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeDec 23rd 2008
    Bolt John Powell

    Hancock's sister score. Doesn't have as a good theme as Hancock, but it's more enjoyable throughout.
    • CommentAuthormarkrayen
    • CommentTimeDec 23rd 2008
    fair enough. smile

    Demetris, your right - it is a bad term. I've had too much southern comfort this evening. How about rephrasing it to "free dissonance"?
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeDec 23rd 2008
    Bare in a mine I don't like disagreeing with intelligent opinions mind you.
    I feel dirty.
    • CommentAuthorAnthony
    • CommentTimeDec 23rd 2008
    Drumline | John Powell

    Another excellent case that when it comes to Powell, smaller is better. wink
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeDec 23rd 2008
    Anthony wrote
    Drumline | John Powell

    Another excellent case that when it comes to Powell, smaller is better. wink


    I bet that's not what she--...oh wait, I'm on probation. Crap.
    • CommentAuthorAnthony
    • CommentTimeDec 23rd 2008
    Nah, it just means he'll have a really fast car. wink
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeDec 23rd 2008 edited
    markrayen wrote
    fair enough. smile

    Demetris, your right - it is a bad term. I've had too much southern comfort this evening. How about rephrasing it to "free dissonance"?


    It's not even free; free dissonance is a child hitting the keys of a piano randomly without knowing what he's doing.

    Listen to Toccata And Dreamscapes, tomorrow, when the booze is out of your system tongue Listen Carefully; there's a musical idea, a level of organization, musicianship and both technical and compositional brilliance that you won't find easily. His dissonance is more organized that the vast majority of tonal and plain easily listenable modern scores out there and that music is simply a brilliant craft; period. Not everyone can do it and it's not a matter of tastes; mind you, as Steven already said but seemed to have gone unnoticed, i TOO listen to Zimmer way more frequently than Goldenthal. But it's not about opinions here.

    In an age where every hack would call himself an "academic composer" and claim stuff like "every tonal piece of music written from the late romantic era onward is a piece of repetitive junk" or "there's nothing to be said via tonal music anymore or nothing to be written" or that "film music is a clever device that was created and exists only to satisfy the cheap pop urges of the directors"*, people that go on and produce junk that they call serialism but nobody can really perform or listen to (as they say they don't care about their music being performed live by physical instruments, ever, or if anyone listens to that at home) but which in essence sounds like a 4 year old hitting the keys of the piano - or place on a live gig 2 chicks rubbing one another and groaning lesbian moans for 10 whole minutes under the escort of random percussive hits and consider that an "art"* , YES, atonal / dissonant music or "academic" composition (as they call it) or serialism / 12-note / whatever, is in SERIOUS crisis and takes a lot MORE to compose such a coherent and meaningful work in the field, as people like Goldenthal or Penderecki or David Shire or Joel McNeely (i know who killed me) among others as well, managed to do numerous times.

    And, like Steven said, of course there's division between artists and composers; it'd be very silly to suggest otherwise, or that it's all about opinions and not real objective means. TASTES and PERSONAL PREFERENCES are the ones circling around subjective opinions, but when it comes to musical writing and composition, there IS objective criteria that set the people doing it apart. To even suggest that in a musical world and history where both Tyler Bates or Graeme Revell (not ditching the later, but i do consider him a very bad composer with some very few bright exceptions) and Beethoven or Tschaikofsky or Wagner (etc) are ALL called composers, yes there IS a means of dividing one's ability and musicianship from another, no matter if some will like it or not.

    Through the years I've came in contact with virtually all the types of music out there, from the music of Morocco and Middle-east to China and Asia, modern popular genres, classical music, renaissance and the Middle ages, Baroque, Romantic era, music of the 20th century, film music, rock, pop, trance, rnb, drum n bass, techno, metal of all kinds, everything, progressive acid, dance of all kinds, electronic and electronica; everything; in all that, based on various factors and usually within each genre specifically ('cause in very few occasions you can go cross-genre and be objective and realistic), there ARE objective and actual criteria on musicianship and it takes both composers and also musicians / artists.

    Writing music is always a hard thing to do; from the simplest children's lullaby to the most complex dissonance out there. You must have enormous data, experience and most importantly absolute musical knowledge of what you're going to do in specific, in order to start off; however - and i believe this, it takes something more than that, in essence and in spirit, to deliver musical noema after that; it's not just knowledge? otherwise you wouldn't be able to tell John Ottman and John Debney from John Williams himself or Andrew Lockington from Elliot Goldenthal or even the RC troops from Zimmer himself. Just because one tries to write something and finds difficulties, it doesn't strictly and exclusively mean that that thing he tries to write is impossible and extremely difficult. Difficult it is, but impossible; no. Usually, the cause lies within the person himself. One might not be ready yet and they have to realize not transfer the "blame" onto an external factor.

    * claims by professors in my university (music department, school of fine arts, composition dpt, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki) during the years 2003-2008. I've been there, in person.

    * actual "composition" presented live, from a young Greek hack (student of the same uni) who calls himself a composer but manages to get ridiculed everytime he attempts to make such a live gig. I've watched that live, in person, this year.
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
  1. Certainly the most erudite entry in this thread for a while! wink
    A butterfly thinks therefore I am
  2. And that's great smile
    http://www.filmmusic.pl - Polish Film Music Review Website
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeDec 24th 2008
    Aliens James Horner

    One cannot sleep. Horror scores seem to relax me in some weird, twisted way.

    Do...do I need to see a doctor?
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeDec 24th 2008
    Christodoulides wrote a lot


    Quite well said, sir.
    •  
      CommentAuthorMiya
    • CommentTimeDec 24th 2008
    NP: Shrek - Harry & John

    I like to play this at breakfast time. cheesy

    Fairytale & Ride The Dragon are my favorites.
    Labels are for cans, not people. - Anthony Rapp
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeDec 24th 2008
    Poltergeist Jerry Goldsmith

    I actually want to marry this score. This really is an excellent score, the epitome of 5 stars IMO.
    •  
      CommentAuthorMiya
    • CommentTimeDec 24th 2008
    Tintin wrote
    Miya wrote


    I never expected I could get an answer on this question here...
    Miya wrote
    On the other hand, the piano theme in emotional cues are really beautiful. I love when Zimmer writes beautiful themes for piano (Spanglish, The Holiday, As Good As It Gets...). Are there any other scores by him that have something like that?


    Such a beautiful piano piece is written for Pearl Harbor!? WOW.


    Yes, that's the one I would have suggested to you. Very emotional music. Have you heardNine Months? It's in the same league, leaning on Mozart's style. It has a more "cutsy" quality to it. If you're looking for something with piano and more jazzy, I would recommend Regarding Henry.


    I have Nine Months, and like it. Though there are some piano piece, I remember more strings on it. I've heard some tracks of Regarding Henry on StreamingSoundtracks, but I don't remember much. I'll check out the album when I get a chance.


    As for Pearl Harbor, I found the action cues are very boring and soulless. But the beautiful piano & strings pieces were worth buying.
    Labels are for cans, not people. - Anthony Rapp
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeDec 24th 2008
    Miya wrote
    As for Pearl Harbor, I found the action cues are very boring and soulless. But the beautiful piano & strings pieces were worth buying.


    I love the score, the whole of it; i guess i am the only one? confused
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
    •  
      CommentAuthorNautilus
    • CommentTimeDec 24th 2008
    Demetris, Why do you think Black Hawk Down is so special? I mean...Why do you think it's so influential when some other scores in the past did some of the things presented in Black Hawk Down?
    •  
      CommentAuthorBhelPuri
    • CommentTimeDec 24th 2008
    Wah! I see a lot of my fave Zimmer works mentioned in the last few posts. I think I like Zimmer best when he's doing the smaller films (The Holiday, Spanglish, House of the Spirits). His action scores just bore me (except for my previous Gladiator-infatuation-phase which was mostly due to the Lisa Gerrard parts).
    Those tender themes from Pearl Harbor I've heard on SST are simply tops. I must check out The Thin Red Line
    •  
      CommentAuthorMarselus
    • CommentTimeDec 24th 2008
    Christodoulides wrote
    Miya wrote
    As for Pearl Harbor, I found the action cues are very boring and soulless. But the beautiful piano & strings pieces were worth buying.


    I love the score, the whole of it; i guess i am the only one? confused


    No you aren´t. I love it too (also the cues by Jablonsky and Badelt, great action themes IMO).
    Anything with an orchestra or with a choir....at some point will reach you
    •  
      CommentAuthorDemetris
    • CommentTimeDec 24th 2008
    Nautilus wrote
    Demetris, Why do you think Black Hawk Down is so special? I mean...Why do you think it's so influential when some other scores in the past did some of the things presented in Black Hawk Down?


    Cause it's a very special blend of sounds and unlike many other middles-eastern influenced scores, it has musical and sonic balance.

    It's tremendously influential. Whilst nobody really bothered with these sounds prior to BHD and Gladiator, Zimmer brought those instruments and arrangements to the wider western audiences which went (and still go crazy) about it; even to date, at least 2 or 3 scores (including game scores which have been tremendously altered since BHD, especially those coming from the RC itself) resembling or being greatly influenced by BHD are being released.

    If we are talking strictly modern film music here, i'd say that the most influential scores of the last 10 years are BHD, GLADIATOR and Powell's Bourne.
    Love Maintitles. It's full of Wanders.
    • CommentAuthormarkrayen
    • CommentTimeDec 24th 2008
    "Free dissonance" is the employment of discordal tension without an obligation to dissolve it. But as far as I know it doesn't have an absolute definition (not in Groves anyway). But I do see how describing Goldenthal's music with that term is an exaggeration (at least for the majority of his output). However, by reading between the lines of my post it should be possible to detect that I am augmenting contrasts only to clarify my point. I don't need to be lectured.

    I think it is unfair to suggest that one composer is more intelligent than another because he has more technique. I would say that Goldenthal has superior technique to that of Zimmer, but not that it would imply grading his "intelligence" as superior to that of Zimmer. Goldenthal has a masters degree in composition and studied with excellent composers. Zimmer on the other hand has his background from rock music and from that platform developed to become more of a "people's" composer (to put it that way). I feel it is a discrimination to believe that his "intelligence" is inferior because of this, similar to the snobbism we were discussing in the "its still star wars to me" thread a couple of days ago. If you rephrase your terminology to use words like "technique" instead of words like "intelligence" or "musicianship", I have no problems with your logic, and think you are making some very good points.

    -Mark smile
    •  
      CommentAuthorNautilus
    • CommentTimeDec 24th 2008
    Christodoulides wrote
    Nautilus wrote
    Demetris, Why do you think Black Hawk Down is so special? I mean...Why do you think it's so influential when some other scores in the past did some of the things presented in Black Hawk Down?


    Cause it's a very special blend of sounds and unlike many other middles-eastern influenced scores, it has musical and sonic balance.

    It's tremendously influential. Whilst nobody really bothered with these sounds prior to BHD and Gladiator, Zimmer brought those instruments and arrangements to the wider western audiences which went (and still go crazy) about it; even to date, at least 2 or 3 scores (including game scores which have been tremendously altered since BHD, especially those coming from the RC itself) resembling or being greatly influenced by BHD are being released.

    If we are talking strictly modern film music here, i'd say that the most influential scores of the last 10 years are BHD, GLADIATOR and Powell's Bourne.
    Christodoulides wrote
    Nautilus wrote
    Demetris, Why do you think Black Hawk Down is so special? I mean...Why do you think it's so influential when some other scores in the past did some of the things presented in Black Hawk Down?


    Cause it's a very special blend of sounds and unlike many other middles-eastern influenced scores, it has musical and sonic balance.

    It's tremendously influential. Whilst nobody really bothered with these sounds prior to BHD and Gladiator, Zimmer brought those instruments and arrangements to the wider western audiences which went (and still go crazy) about it; even to date, at least 2 or 3 scores (including game scores which have been tremendously altered since BHD, especially those coming from the RC itself) resembling or being greatly influenced by BHD are being released.

    If we are talking strictly modern film music here, i'd say that the most influential scores of the last 10 years are BHD, GLADIATOR and Powell's Bourne.


    oh! in the most influential scores of the last 10 yeares there aren't any Goldenthal scores? biggrin

    Just Kidding. wink
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeDec 24th 2008
    That's because they're too hard to copy and producers are scared to have such intelligent film music used in their films! tongue biggrin
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteven
    • CommentTimeDec 24th 2008
    Air Force One Jerry Goldsmith

    For me, Christmas is partly about playing lots of Goldsmith. Every year for the past maybe 8 years or so (?) I would always receive at least one Goldsmith CD for Christmas. (Twilight Zone: The Movie and Under Fire was a particularly fine set of presents.)
    •  
      CommentAuthorAtham
    • CommentTimeDec 24th 2008
    Steven wrote
    Poltergeist Jerry Goldsmith

    I actually want to marry this score. This really is an excellent score, the epitome of 5 stars IMO.


    Absolutely amazing score! You have such fine taste master Steven! beer